ProPublica is an independent, non-profit newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. We strive to foster change through exposing exploitation of the weak by the strong and the failures of those with power to vindicate the trust placed in them.
In perhaps one of the least surprising developments of recent months, the New York Times, citing "senior administration officials," reports that President Bush will not be closing the prison in Guantánamo Bay before he turns out the lights at the White House.
President Bush has previously made comments expressing a desire to ultimately, sometime in the future, close Gitmo. "It should be a goal of the nation to shut down Guantánamo," he said last year. "But it is not as easy a subject as some may think on the surface."
According to the Times, the president "never considered proposals drafted in the State Department and the Pentagon that outlined options for transferring the detainees elsewhere."
The White House apparently had a meeting this summer after the Supreme Court decided that Gitmo detainees must have access to U.S. courts. Says the Times: "Bush adopted the view of his most hawkish advisers that closing Guantánamo would involve too many legal and political risks to be acceptable, now or any time soon."
According to the Times, the administration is going full-steam ahead, "proceeding on the assumption that Guantánamo will remain open not only for the rest of Mr. Bush's presidency but also well beyond."
Both Sens. McCain and Obama have called for closing Gitmo (though with little detail about how). But an "administration official" predicted that the "new president [whoever he is] will gnash his teeth and beat his head against the wall when he realizes how complicated it is to close Guantánamo."
(As for why none of these quotes have a name attached, the Times offers the following boilerplate: They "spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the administration's internal deliberations.")
According to the Times, the administration's no-change policy for Gitmo includes proceeding with the war crimes tribunals there. Meanwhile, the tribunals have not exactly been going swimmingly lately. Last month, for instance, a prosecutor at the one of the trials resigned and complained that the prosecution had not given the defense "potentially exculpatory evidence." He was the sixth Gitmo prosecutor to step down or refuse to prosecute, citing qualms with the system.
Interested in what Eric Umansky is reading today? Read the articles around the Web he’s sharing.
This story can be found on the web at the following address:
http://www.propublica.org/article/admin-on-gitmo-were-staying-the-course-1021/
Need to know more? Get ProPublica headlines delivered by e-mail every day.
This Year in Scandals: Gitmo
by Alexandra Andrews - December 23, 2008 4:23 pm
Another (Little-Noticed) Setback for Gitmo Prosecutors
by Sharona Coutts - December 8, 2008 5:27 pm
Bush—By Your Numbers
by Eric Umansky - December 8, 2008 11:01 am
Midnight Reg Watch: In Turnabout, EPA Allows Mining Debris Near Streams
by Joaquin Sapien - December 4, 2008 1:01 pm
Bush Rule on Oil Shale Highlights Partisan Divide in West
by Joaquin Sapien - November 22, 2008 10:30 am
Helpers or Hucksters? A Look at ‘Mortgage Mod’ Firms
by Paul Kiel - December 29, 2008 11:49 am
On the Way Out, the SEC Chief’s Non-Mea Culpa
by Sharona Coutts - December 24, 2008 11:37 am
Regulators to IndyMac: No Need to Keep Accurate Books
by Kristin Jones - December 23, 2008 11:54 am
Madoff’s ‘Booster Rocket’
by Alexandra Andrews - December 22, 2008 11:06 am
Blago Wants His Money (For His Lawyers)
by Ben Protess - December 19, 2008 11:59 am