Bill Introduced to Reform Workers’ Comp for Military Contractors
A proposed update to the Defense Base Act would provide a federal program for workers’ compensation for military contractors killed or injured on the job.
The ranking member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform introduced legislation today that would shore up workers' compensation insurance for civilian military contractors, replacing a controversial private system with one backed by the federal government.
The proposal by Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., would revise provisions in the Defense Base Act, which requires military contractors to provide workers' compensation for American and foreign employees.
Currently, contractors purchase coverage from insurance companies, but as ProPublica reported in 2009, contractors injured in Iraq and Afghanistan often have had to battle with private insurers to obtain medical treatments and disability payments. Many foreign contractors have been entirely left in the dark about the benefits they were owed.
The current system also imposes hefty costs on taxpayers, as the premiums for workers' comp policies are generally built into military contracts. An Army audit concluded that some premiums were "unreasonably high and excessive" and congressional investigations have found that insurers have earned hundreds of millions in profits from them.
In introducing his proposal — under which the government would pay benefits directly to injured contractors or their survivors — Cummings cited a 2009 Pentagon study which estimated that a federal workers' comp program could save taxpayers $250 million a year.
"There is absolutely no reason American taxpayers should be lining the pockets of private insurance companies," he said in a statement.
The Pentagon's report said insurance companies would probably oppose any attempt to alter the Defense Base Act's workers' comp requirements. As of now, AIG, the dominant warzone insurance provider, has not responded to our request for comment on Cummings' bill.
A spokesman for the Department of Labor, which oversees the Defense Base Act's implementation, said they were not yet ready to comment on the proposal.
ProPublica's investigation found that the agency had not expanded its operation to sufficiently cope with the influx of claims that came with unprecedented numbers of contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan.
War contractors return home with the same scars as soldiers, but without the support.
The Story So Far
Civilian contractors have been an indispensable part of the U.S. war effort in Iraq and Afghanistan, but they have returned home without the support available for troops in uniform.
Tens of thousands of civilians have worked in the two battle zones, delivering fuel, protecting diplomats and translating for troops, among other jobs.
Latest Stories in this Project
- Iraq War Contractor Fined for Late Reports of 30 Casualties
- U.S. Insurance Firm Neglects Survivors of Iraqi Translators, May Face Criminal Charges
- This Year, Contractor Deaths Exceed Military Ones in Iraq and Afghanistan
- The Other Victims of Battlefield Stress; Defense Contractors' Mental Health Neglected
- Our Articles on Wounded Iraq and Afghan Interpreters -- Now in Arabic
Our Hottest Stories
- In Desegregation Case, Judge Blasts School Officials and Justice Department
- Meet the Online Tracking Device That is Virtually Impossible to Block
- California Halts Injection of Fracking Waste, Warning it May Be Contaminating Aquifers
- What We Learned Investigating Unpaid Internships
- Who Advised Cuomo on Mortgage Industry Investigation? A Mortgage Lobbyist
- Are Patient Privacy Laws Being Misused to Protect Medical Centers?
- Why Are Obstetricians Among the Top Billers for Group Psychotherapy in Illinois?
- Thank You for Your Service: How One Company Sues Soldiers Worldwide
- New York State of Fracking: A ProPublica Explainer
- Error: You Have No Payments from Pharma