California Pension Fund to Regulate Placement Agents
Last week, we reported with the Los Angeles Times that a key player indicted in New York state’s pension scandal had been active in California pension funds. Now, California’s biggest fund is acting.
The $165 billion California Public Employees’ Retirement System said it wants better disclosure about fees paid to “placement agents” -- middlemen who help investment firms get business with the fund.
Though a mainstay in the investment world, placement agents have become controversial thanks to the ongoing “pay-to-play” investigation in New York, where Hank Morris, a placement agent and onetime political adviser to former state Comptroller Alan G. Hevesi, has been charged with bribery and fraud.
Attorney General Andrew Cuomo accused Morris and associates of accepting $30 million in undisclosed fees and bribes to arrange business for investment firms with the $122 billion pension fund.
A California placement firm, Wetherly Capital Group, received $313,750 in fees from Morris and another a firm he worked with in New York. Wetherly also shared fees with Morris for deals at CalPERS, the California teachers’ pension fund and Los Angeles Fire and Police Pensions, we reported last week.
Wetherly said there has been no suggestion of criminal or improper conduct on the firm’s behalf and that it is cooperating with investigators in New York.
The president of CalPERS board, Rob Feckner, said Monday that he has asked for a new policy on disclosure of fees paid to placement agents by investment firms that get business with the fund. Agents are typically paid 1 percent to 2 percent of the total amount secured in a placement.
CalPERS currently does not have any policy regarding the use of middlemen, which sets it apart from public funds in states such as Illinois and New York, which last week banned placement agents.
“Recently an issue of possible improper influence was revealed,” CalPERS said in a news release.
“Actually, it was the media reports in ProPublica and elsewhere about the issues relating to placement agents and the disclosures about New York,” CalPERS spokeswoman Pat Macht told us.
As yet, there are no details on what the policy would be or how it would be enforced. The issue will be discussed at the May 11 meeting of the CalPERS investment committee, Macht said.
Our Hottest Stories
- Meet the Online Tracking Device That is Virtually Impossible to Block
- California Halts Injection of Fracking Waste, Warning it May Be Contaminating Aquifers
- What We Learned Investigating Unpaid Internships
- Who Advised Cuomo on Mortgage Industry Investigation? A Mortgage Lobbyist
- Thank You for Your Service: How One Company Sues Soldiers Worldwide
- Are Patient Privacy Laws Being Misused to Protect Medical Centers?
- Campus Sexual Assault: What Are Colleges Doing Wrong?
- Error: You Have No Payments from Pharma
- Even After Open Enrollment, Activity Remains Unexpectedly High on Federal Health Insurance Exchange
- New York State of Fracking: A ProPublica Explainer