Details on $20 Million TARP Contract Still Secret
Nearly four months after the Treasury Department named Bank of New York Mellon its chief contractor for the taxpayer-funded bailout, we finally know how much money it’s paying the bank.
New York Mellon is estimated to receive about $20 million, far more than any other bailout contractor, to keep the books for the government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).
The disclosure came not from Treasury, but from the government’s watchdogs.
Treasury has still redacted the compensation figures and other terms of the deal from the publicly released copy of the contract, which it issued in October. At the time, Treasury officials said it would only be a matter of weeks before the details were released.
This estimate led us to wind up the ProPublica Promise Clock—an effort to track how long it would take the department to release the figures.
The $20 million figure appeared in a GAO report issued late last month, and was first noticed by BailoutSleuth.com.
But the government is not wedded to giving the bank $20 million.
“Treasury has calculated what they expect the value to be,” said a spokesman for the bank, Kevin Heine. Heine added that the $20 million was not finalized and could change.
In just over two months on the job, according to a report yesterday from the TARP’s special inspector general, the bank already has received more than $4 million from the government to track and hold TARP assets. The bank also is responsible for actually cutting checks to the financial institutions approved for investments.
At one point, the bank had a minor slip-up.
The special inspector general ‘s report revealed that the bank made an error in releasing bailout funds to GMAC after closing documents had been signed but before receiving approval from Treasury.
A Treasury spokesman didn’t immediately return our calls for comment today. The report added that the mistake didn’t appear to have resulted in any loss of funds.
So why has Treasury itself not released the information?
In November, Treasury spokeswoman Jennifer Zuccarelli explained that the department does not want to reveal the financial terms of the three-year deal while other contracts related to the bailout are being negotiated. “We don’t want to put ourselves at a competitive disadvantage,” she said.
It’s unclear, however, whether any outstanding contracts remain.
So long as the contract remains blacked out, we will keep alive the tick-tock of the Promise Clock.
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- Bill Would Require Independent Study of X-Ray Body Scanners
- Allergan Erases Doctor Payment Records
- With Spotlight on Super PAC Dollars, Nonprofits Escape Scrutiny
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- Bill Would Require Independent Study of X-Ray Body Scanners
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- Meet the Obscure Federal Regulator Who's Not Helping Homeowners
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- One Soldier's Progress Against Traumatic Brain Injury
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told







5 comments
CoyoteMan
Feb. 7, 2009, 12:55 p.m.
I don’t want to hear from anyone that you didn’t know TARP was a Bush Administration Scam.
Ok because that makes you a liar or a Republican.
wild watcher
Feb. 8, 2009, 8:14 p.m.
I must agree with Coyote…its like these Republicans reawake every day, with a blank slate. And while I’m at it… I hate democrats too! rofl wild;)
wild watcher
Feb. 8, 2009, 8:36 p.m.
I hope tHEy atleast rename the ‘moral outrage’....you know—all that fistpounding concern for the kids/grandkids, and the gosh-awful legacy they legislated for them…is just getting old.
wild;)
jack james
Feb. 9, 2009, 6:53 a.m.
Hello everyone,
I’m a newbie to website design and being a this site. I’m stopping by a few sites to pick up tips and get answers from people who know a lot more about this that I do! homes for sale
wild watcher
Feb. 15, 2009, 2:31 a.m.
A very telling bit of proof, the author Protess explains..the first reports of the private sector contracting. I would like to expand a touch further and opine that the U.S. gov. has no intention of CONTROLLING vast amounts of money/credit/underwriting previously legislated as the ‘$700b swindle’. Nor is this gov. going to MANAGE the additional money/credit/underwriting ‘$800b swindle’ presently pending.
I mean really…all news reports simply verify this privatized direction. Its true, the US legislative committees seem to be grilling several CEO’s ..demanding responsibility FOR ‘tax payer/TARP funds’. So that makes my point exactly, that the U.S. gov. has given away the responsibility/trust of U.S. gov. funds TO these private contracting individuals/financial entities. The fact that Protess brings out, verifys that the ‘oversight responsibility’ has been contracted, in this example to Mellon.
The reason is obvious, the U.S. gov. now REFUSES to manage the ongoing wealth that made this country great.
Theretofore, opting for private managers to do it for them. You can spot the willingness private managers have, gladly taking multimillion dollar pay cuts, and continued desire to work… for a dollar/ year…while controlling Trillions.
Sen. C. Shumer said something the other day about the ‘public doesn’t really care’..(about the pork). I would rather have said: the public can’t do a thing about it.
wild;)
Commenting on this story is closed.