Even With Stimulus, SC Schools May Hurt
After his final legal resistance to accepting $700 million in stimulus funds -- largely earmarked for education -- was knocked down by South Carolina's Supreme Court, Gov. Mark Sanford reluctantly submitted an application for State Fiscal Stabilization Funds on Monday. Great news for South Carolina schools, right? Well, sort of.
As we noted yesterday, the dilapidated South Carolina school that became a focal point of President Obama's emotional appeal on behalf of the stimulus won't get any less haggard -- its school district is getting just $900,000, which will be used for reducing cutbacks rather than fixing up buildings.
More bad news for South Carolina schools, according to the application Sanford submitted, is that the state is about to join an exclusive club of undesirable distinction: states that need a waiver to allow them to reduce public school funding in 2009 or 2010 to below 2006 levels. In order to obtain the fiscal stabilization funds, states have to ensure the federal government that they will continue to fund public schools and colleges at least at the level of funding from 2006. U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan has continually reminded state officials that the fiscal stabilization funds are to be used to avoid cuts, but also to drive reform.
According to ProPublica's review of the 38 applications submitted to the Education Department so far, only seven states and Puerto Rico have indicated that they intend to drop funding for schools or colleges in 2009 or 2010 to below 2006 levels. Only Florida -- and now South Carolina -- have declared intentions to do so for K-12 public schools. According to South Carolina's application, which has not yet been approved, the state plans to drop funding for elementary and secondary education in 2010 from 2006 levels by $24.7 million dollars, to about $2.5 billion.
Four other states (Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey and Rhode Island) and Puerto Rico plan to decrease funding for public colleges in 2009 or 2010 from 2006 levels, and several other states will toe the line. Colorado, Connecticut, Minnesota and Oregon will keep funding for schools or colleges in 2009 or 2010 exactly equal to funding from 2006, and Tennessee will toss an extra $34 at public colleges in 2010. And, as we reported last week, California corrected an accounting error on its application, which dropped the reported 2006 funding level by $2.3 billion. That will provide some wiggle room if the steep cuts Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger proposed are implemented.
A Department of Education spokesman said he would let us know whether South Carolina will receive a waiver, so we'll let you know what they say.
Latest Stories in this Project
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- Allergan Erases Doctor Payment Records
- With Spotlight on Super PAC Dollars, Nonprofits Escape Scrutiny
- Senators Slam Freddie on Bets Against Homeowners
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- Meet the Obscure Federal Regulator Who's Not Helping Homeowners
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- Why Millions Won't Get Help From Big Mortgage Settlement
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- One Soldier's Progress Against Traumatic Brain Injury
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told







2 comments
Ms. Accountability
June 12, 2009, 1:15 p.m.
It’s great that you’re going to follow up on whether the USDOE accepts the waiver. They keep saying they’re remaining transparent about the process, but it seems to take tough reporters like you to make sure that happens.
Ms. Accountability
June 12, 2009, 1:28 p.m.
So what in the world will South Carolina do two years from now, when the stimulus funding dries up???
Commenting on this story is closed.