FDA Failing on Food Safety, Needs Money
As the Food and Drug Administration continues its investigation on the source of salmonella-tainted tomatoes that have sickened 228 people across the U.S., a Government Accountability Office report released yesterday noted that the FDA has failed to implement a November 2007 food protection plan designed to stop such outbreaks before they begin. Key senators had actually pushed to fund the plan, but the FDA was initially unresponsive.
The same month that the food safety plan was released, the FDA’s Science Board concluded that the administration lacked the staff and financial resources to implement it, saying that the plan would require an increase of $128 million in fiscal year 2009 alone. Yet despite the need, FDA chief Andrew von Eschenbach at first refused to tell Congress what he would need to implement the plan. It was only after a plea from Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) asking the commissioner how much money he wanted to “protect the public’s health” that Eschenbach reversed his stance, and requested $275 million.
On Monday, Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt announced a formal request to include an additional $275 million for the FDA’s fiscal year 2009 budget. Frustrated that this money would not get into the FDA’s hand for another year, Specter wrote a letter to Leavitt, stating this “submission undermines the work we have been doing to obtain these additional dollars on an expedited basis.” Specter’s initial offer would have gotten the FDA the money by the end of September.
As The Wall Street Journal reported on its health blog, the FDA may have been reluctant to initially tell Congress exactly how much money was needed because of an obscure Office of Management Budget rule that prohibits a federal agency from publicly disagreeing with the President’s budget request.
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- Allergan Erases Doctor Payment Records
- With Spotlight on Super PAC Dollars, Nonprofits Escape Scrutiny
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- Meet the Obscure Federal Regulator Who's Not Helping Homeowners
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- One Soldier's Progress Against Traumatic Brain Injury
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told
- Senator Demands Answers from Freddie Mac’s Regulator







2 comments
quantumquiziker
June 25, 2008, 1:02 p.m.
If FDA were a company, heads would roll over poisoned food. Their excuse is not enough money. But it’s no secret that accountability is missing from government job requirements. One must ask, “Who does the work when people are on vacation? Does someone else take up the slack, or do job duties go on vacation too?”
Imagine what would happen at FedEx if a driver’s deliveries waited for him or her to return from vacation. It’s also no secret that the government is a last-resort employer for low-scoring college grads. Could ineptitude also be a standard in their cultural mix?
Ryan S.
June 27, 2008, 11:20 a.m.
Having worked in the private sector and now the public sector, I find it a myth that heads are constantly rolling in the private sector. Public oversight is a far more demanding motivator than the quest for the bottom line. I found profit to be more of a motivator to cover up abuses and incompetence.
The FDA, as well as the IRS and other agencies, are underfunded to render them ineffective. Then the public perception of these agencies is one that says they are inept and we should just let industry police itself, after all, they have the profit motive. They surely would not want to sell tainted meat now would they? It would effect their bottom line?
And the last time I sent a letter through FedEx, it cost 16 dollars.
Commenting on this story is closed.