Who We Are

ProPublica is an independent, non-profit newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. We strive to foster change through exposing exploitation of the weak by the strong and the failures of those with power to vindicate the trust placed in them.

More...

GAO Investigating Medicare Auditors

by Sharona Coutts, ProPublica - August 22, 2008 2:15 pm EDT

Credit: AdvanceMedWe wrote yesterday about the new Medicare fraud scandal, and how agency officials allegedly pressured their private auditors to use questionable accounting methods, resulting in figures that greatly underestimated the extent of false and unsupported claims for medical equipment.

The information comes from a draft inspector general's report detailed in the New York Times.

While the report focused on just medical equipment fraud, the company that did the audits, AdvanceMed, actually has many more contracts with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), for similar projects to do with tracking down false and undocumented medical claims.

The Government Accountability Office told us they've begun investigating one of those other projects.

The Medicare Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) program, which "employs private companies on a contingent-fee basis to identify and recover improper over and under-payments of Medicare funds," started as a pilot in 2003 and was extended in 2006.

The program ran into difficulties since contractors hired to detect fraud were allegedly using unqualified personnel and inconsistent methods. In mid-July, five congressmen wrote to the GAO complaining about the program and requesting an investigation.

GAO spokeswoman Kathy King told us few details about the inquiry are available at this stage because it is so new, but that the investigation will look at "the changes that CMS has implemented from the pilot program to the permanent program."

AdvanceMed was not one of the primary RAC contractors, but they did work as "validation contractors" on the project. Neither the GAO, nor the offices of the congressmen who requested the GAO report knew exactly what that role entailed, and AdvanceMed's Kaye would not comment.

AdvanceMed calls itself "one of the most successful companies in the Medicare Integrity Program," and it won last year's "Investigation of the Year Award" from the national Health Care Anti-Fraud Association.

In promoting the award, the company wrote: "Identifying and combating fraud, waste and abuse in the nation’s Medicare program is necessary in protecting our elderly population from unscrupulous health care providers who deliberately endanger patients’ lives to cheat the system."

AdvanceMed's Web site lists six projects on Medicare fraud, operating in 23 states. CMS is their most important client, according to AdvanceMed's head of operations, Phyllis Kaye.

Kaye wouldn't comment on the GAO investigation, nor on the allegations that CMS ordered her company to use incorrect accounting methods. (According to the Times, the inspector general's report said such an order might violate the law.)

"We are asked by CMS to refer all requests to them," she told ProPublica. "When you get a request from your client, that's what you do."

This story can be found on the web at the following address:
http://www.propublica.org/article/gao-investigating-medicare-auditors-822/

Need to know more? Get ProPublica headlines delivered by e-mail every day.

Links

ProPublica Reporting Network

Sign up to be notified of reporting opportunities.

Related Articles

Device Complaints Slip Through the Cracks at FDA
by Christina Jewett - June 18, 2009 3:32 pm

Hearing Airs Horror Stories on Abuse of School Kids
by Christina Jewett - May 19, 2009 1:29 pm

Everything You Want to Know About Blago’s Indictment
by Ben Protess - April 3, 2009 12:49 pm

Contracting Fraud: A Glossary
by Michael Grabell - March 17, 2009 9:15 pm

Quick Picks: NYC’s ‘Rubber Rooms’ and Medicare Fraud
by Alexandra Andrews - March 9, 2009 10:32 am


© Copyright 2009 Pro Publica Inc.

FREE REPRINTS

 You can republish our articles for free, if you credit us, link to us, and don't edit our material or sell it separately. (We're licensed under Creative Commons, which provides the legal details.)