Government Could Lose Billions to Oil Industry on Royalties
Oil companies may receive a $53 billion boon thanks to a royalty relief package designed to enhance the appeal of drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, according to a draft of a new Government Accountability Office report obtained by Politico.
The break on royalties stems from the Deep Water Royalty Relief Act passed in November 1995 by a Republican Congress seeking to encourage oil companies to drill in sections of the Gulf of Mexico that were more than 200 meters deep.
The watchdogs at the Project on Governmental Oversight, which have long followed the issue, have more details:
The law was intended to provide incentives for more costly drilling in deeper areas of the Gulf by allowing companies to avoid paying royalties for specific volumes when oil prices were below certain thresholds. However, for leases issued in 1998 and 1999, the price thresholds were errantly omitted, and the price of oil has since increased dramatically, now surpassing four times the original thresholds.
Once the threshold omissions were revealed publicly in 2006, Interior sought to renegotiate the faulty leases with the oil companies. A small number agreed, but the vast majority of them are holding out. Congress has also made several attempts to address the issue but without much success. This relative inaction is partly due to a lawsuit brought by Kerr-McGee (now owned by Anadarko) in March 2006 against the Department of Interior, which if won, could result in the government losing royalties on virtually all deepwater leases. The federal court sided with Kerr-McGee (pdf) in a ruling last year, but Interior has since appealed.
As POGO pointed out, a 2006 Interior Inspector General investigation showed that between 1998 and 1999 the Mineral Management Service issued roughly a thousand leases to oil companies without price thresholds.
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- Allergan Erases Doctor Payment Records
- With Spotlight on Super PAC Dollars, Nonprofits Escape Scrutiny
- Senators Slam Freddie on Bets Against Homeowners
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- Meet the Obscure Federal Regulator Who's Not Helping Homeowners
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- One Soldier's Progress Against Traumatic Brain Injury
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told
- Why Millions Won't Get Help From Big Mortgage Settlement






