Inhofe Defends Hydraulic Fracturing on Senate Floor
In a lengthy speech Tuesday Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., the ranking member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, defended the natural gas production method of hydraulic fracturing and warned that legislation reinstating the Environmental Protection Agency's authority over the process would be a "disaster." Inhofe pointed to recent reports showing that America's reserves of natural gas are far greater than previously thought, and said that developing those reserves — which he pointed out depends on hydraulic fracturing — could help secure America's energy future.
For 26 minutes, Inhofe offered a detailed response to critics of the process and reiterated the central arguments that have been offered by the energy industry and lobby: that fracturing is safe; that recent reports say regulating it would cost Americans billions in jobs and lost tax revenues; and that the Safe Drinking Water Act, the federal water protection law from which fracturing is currently exempted, was never intended to oversee the process in the first place. Many of these assertions have been challenged in a series of articles by ProPublica. Read the full text of Inhofe's speech, and watch the video, here.
Fracking: Gas Drilling's Environmental Threat
The promise of abundant natural gas is colliding with fears about water contamination.
The Story So Far
The country’s push to find clean domestic energy has zeroed in on natural gas, but cases of water contamination have raised serious questions about the primary drilling method being used. Vast deposits of natural gas, large enough to supply the country for decades, have brought a drilling boom stretching across 31 states. The drilling technique being used, called hydraulic fracturing, shoots water, sand and toxic chemicals into the ground to break up rock and release the gas.
Latest Stories in this Project
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- Bill Would Require Independent Study of X-Ray Body Scanners
- Allergan Erases Doctor Payment Records
- Texas Court Voids Conviction in Child Death Case
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- Bill Would Require Independent Study of X-Ray Body Scanners
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- Meet the Obscure Federal Regulator Who's Not Helping Homeowners
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- One Soldier's Progress Against Traumatic Brain Injury
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told






