Judge’s Order May Force Gov’t to Outright Dismiss Case
Today's decision by a military judge in one case at Guantanamo Bay -- rejecting the Obama administration's move to freeze all war crimes trials -- will likely force the government to drop charges against the defendant, Abd al Rahim al-Nashiri. The other war crimes cases at Gitmo have been suspended, following President Obama's request for a 120-day halt to the proceedings so his administration can review the cases.
Nashiri was one of three prisoners known to be subjected to waterboarding. His arraignment was scheduled for Feb. 9. But as the Washington Post reported earlier today, Judge James Pohl, an Army colonel, wrote that "the public interest in a speedy trial will be harmed by the delay in the arraignment."
Likely the only way for the Pentagon to now comply with the judge's decision as well as the president's directives is to drop the charges against Nashiri.
"Trust me there will be no proceedings continuing down at Gitmo with military commissions," Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell told the Post.
Military prosecutors could eventually reinstate charges once the Obama administration has settled on procedures for future trials, possibly in federal court. Obama signed an executive order last week aiming to shutter Guantanamo within a year.
What makes Nashiri's case unique is the fact that he allegedly confessed, after being waterboarded, to involvement in the October 2000 attack on the USS Cole warship, which killed 17 sailors and injured 50 others. Nashiri has been in custody since 2002, first at the hands of the CIA and then later by the military at Guantanamo.
The CIA videotaped Nashiri's interrogation -- and then destroyed those tapes in 2005. (The DOJ began a criminal investigation last year into the destruction.)
In addition to Nashiri, the CIA used waterboarding -- which involves near-drowning a prisoner -- on Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, accused of organizing the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, and on Abu Zubayda, who was allegedly a top deputy to Osama bin Laden in the late 1990s. Zubayda and Mohammed are both at Guantanamo, but Zubayda has not been charged with anything.
Last week, Obama signed executive orders banning the CIA from using waterboarding. His nominee for attorney general, Eric Holder, said during his confirmation hearing that waterboarding is torture.
The government remains uncertain what to do with its prisoners at Guantanamo Bay.
Latest Stories in this Project
- Newly Released Memo Inadvertently Reveals CIA Held (and Abused) Missing Prisoner
- Gitmo and the Federal Judiciary: Our Coverage of the Habeas Lawsuits
- In Gitmo Opinion, Two Versions of Reality
- Appeals Court Makes It Easier for Gov’t to Hold Gitmo Detainees
- Obama Counterterrorism Adviser Slams Congressional Efforts to Block Guantanamo’s Closure
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- Allergan Erases Doctor Payment Records
- With Spotlight on Super PAC Dollars, Nonprofits Escape Scrutiny
- Senators Slam Freddie on Bets Against Homeowners
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- Meet the Obscure Federal Regulator Who's Not Helping Homeowners
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- One Soldier's Progress Against Traumatic Brain Injury
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told
- Why Millions Won't Get Help From Big Mortgage Settlement
2 comments
Chuck Draves
Jan. 29, 2009, 10:07 p.m.
The colonel is concerned about the public’s interest in a speedy trial? Where has he been sequestered for the past seven years? Maybe he just knows that “evidence” garnered by torturing the accused won’t be admissible in any fairly constituted U.S. court. “Speedy” is not the core concern; due process is.
Nelson Robison
Feb. 1, 2009, 9:10 a.m.
The very idea of using information gained during torture sessions is an abominable and illegal display of juris prudence. As a country are we going to allow another administration to “go to the dark side,” as “Darth Vader,” said many times?
My sense of the Obama administrations intentions are that we will now follow the rule of law, the Geneva Conventions of war, and just plain moral thinking and actions. As a nation we cannot long survive the kind of thinking and actions that we encountered during the shrub’s administration.
Should we ever again, have an administration that considers itself above the laws of the land, the laws of
International agreement, then we will have declined into
the land of authoritarianism and fascist thinking.
Pray or not, that this never happens.
Commenting on this story is closed.