Judge’s Order May Force Gov’t to Outright Dismiss Case
Today's decision by a military judge in one case at Guantanamo Bay -- rejecting the Obama administration's move to freeze all war crimes trials -- will likely force the government to drop charges against the defendant, Abd al Rahim al-Nashiri. The other war crimes cases at Gitmo have been suspended, following President Obama's request for a 120-day halt to the proceedings so his administration can review the cases.
Nashiri was one of three prisoners known to be subjected to waterboarding. His arraignment was scheduled for Feb. 9. But as the Washington Post reported earlier today, Judge James Pohl, an Army colonel, wrote that "the public interest in a speedy trial will be harmed by the delay in the arraignment."
Likely the only way for the Pentagon to now comply with the judge's decision as well as the president's directives is to drop the charges against Nashiri.
"Trust me there will be no proceedings continuing down at Gitmo with military commissions," Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell told the Post.
Military prosecutors could eventually reinstate charges once the Obama administration has settled on procedures for future trials, possibly in federal court. Obama signed an executive order last week aiming to shutter Guantanamo within a year.
What makes Nashiri's case unique is the fact that he allegedly confessed, after being waterboarded, to involvement in the October 2000 attack on the USS Cole warship, which killed 17 sailors and injured 50 others. Nashiri has been in custody since 2002, first at the hands of the CIA and then later by the military at Guantanamo.
The CIA videotaped Nashiri's interrogation -- and then destroyed those tapes in 2005. (The DOJ began a criminal investigation last year into the destruction.)
In addition to Nashiri, the CIA used waterboarding -- which involves near-drowning a prisoner -- on Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, accused of organizing the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, and on Abu Zubayda, who was allegedly a top deputy to Osama bin Laden in the late 1990s. Zubayda and Mohammed are both at Guantanamo, but Zubayda has not been charged with anything.
Last week, Obama signed executive orders banning the CIA from using waterboarding. His nominee for attorney general, Eric Holder, said during his confirmation hearing that waterboarding is torture.
The government remains uncertain what to do with its prisoners at Guantanamo Bay.
Latest Stories in this Project
- Newly Released Memo Inadvertently Reveals CIA Held (and Abused) Missing Prisoner
- Gitmo and the Federal Judiciary: Our Coverage of the Habeas Lawsuits
- In Gitmo Opinion, Two Versions of Reality
- Appeals Court Makes It Easier for Gov’t to Hold Gitmo Detainees
- Obama Counterterrorism Adviser Slams Congressional Efforts to Block Guantanamo’s Closure
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- Donations to Scott Walker Flagged as Potential Fraud
- In Race For Better Cell Service, Men Who Climb Towers Pay With Their Lives
- Billion Dollar Bait & Switch: States Divert Foreclosure Deal Funds
- Pardon Attorney Torpedoes Plea for Presidential Mercy
- Patient Died at New York VA Hospital After Alarm Was Ignored
- Introducing the ProPublica Patient Harm Community on Facebook
- Got Student Loans? Share Your Documents With Us
- Built for a Simpler Era, OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die
- Remember Stuxnet? Why the U.S. is Still Vulnerable
- Congressional Leader Calls for Investigation of the Pardon Office
- Donations to Scott Walker Flagged as Potential Fraud
- Pardon Attorney Torpedoes Plea for Presidential Mercy
- In Race For Better Cell Service, Men Who Climb Towers Pay With Their Lives
- Air Force Pilots Balk at Flying the World’s Most Expensive Fighter Jet
- Patient Died at New York VA Hospital After Alarm Was Ignored
- Watchdog Group Calls for Probe of Lobbyists Behind Congressional Trip to Taiwan
- Billion Dollar Bait & Switch: States Divert Foreclosure Deal Funds
- N.Y. Congressman Will Reimburse Costs for $22,000 Taiwan trip
- Remember Stuxnet? Why the U.S. is Still Vulnerable
- Happy Graduation! Here's The Best, Most Depressing Journalism on Student Debt
2 comments
Chuck Draves
Jan. 29, 2009, 11:07 p.m.
The colonel is concerned about the public’s interest in a speedy trial? Where has he been sequestered for the past seven years? Maybe he just knows that “evidence” garnered by torturing the accused won’t be admissible in any fairly constituted U.S. court. “Speedy” is not the core concern; due process is.
Nelson Robison
Feb. 1, 2009, 10:10 a.m.
The very idea of using information gained during torture sessions is an abominable and illegal display of juris prudence. As a country are we going to allow another administration to “go to the dark side,” as “Darth Vader,” said many times?
My sense of the Obama administrations intentions are that we will now follow the rule of law, the Geneva Conventions of war, and just plain moral thinking and actions. As a nation we cannot long survive the kind of thinking and actions that we encountered during the shrub’s administration.
Should we ever again, have an administration that considers itself above the laws of the land, the laws of
International agreement, then we will have declined into
the land of authoritarianism and fascist thinking.
Pray or not, that this never happens.
Commenting on this story is closed.