Just 12 Percent of Stimulus Money Has Been Spent
Nearly six months after the ginormous stimulus bill passed, politicians and economists are arguing about whether it has made much of a dent in the limping economy.
Defenders of the bill — President Barack Obama among them — insist it is too soon to tell because the stimulus hasn't had much of a chance to work. They have one key fact on their side — though it's a fact critics could just as easily use: Only $70 billion, or about 12 percent of the $580 billion in the spending portion of the stimulus package, is out the door so far. (It's much more difficult to track the tax cut portion, which makes up the bill's remaining $212 billion.)
Moreover, that 12 percent includes some $13 billion from the Social Security Administration in one-time $250 checks to current Social Security recipients. Those payments, while helpful for those who received them, represent the low-hanging fruit of stimulus spending, requiring no requests for proposals, no bidding process and no contracts to be tendered, invoiced and paid. Those Social Security checks make up almost one-fifth of the stimulus "spending" so far.
We’re going to continue tracking the speed at which money is being spent, as a key to how well the stimulus is working, updating our progress bar every week.
Latest Stories in this Project
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- Donations to Scott Walker Flagged as Potential Fraud
- In Race For Better Cell Service, Men Who Climb Towers Pay With Their Lives
- Billion Dollar Bait & Switch: States Divert Foreclosure Deal Funds
- Pardon Attorney Torpedoes Plea for Presidential Mercy
- Patient Died at New York VA Hospital After Alarm Was Ignored
- Introducing the ProPublica Patient Harm Community on Facebook
- Got Student Loans? Share Your Documents With Us
- Built for a Simpler Era, OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die
- Remember Stuxnet? Why the U.S. is Still Vulnerable
- Congressional Leader Calls for Investigation of the Pardon Office
- Donations to Scott Walker Flagged as Potential Fraud
- Pardon Attorney Torpedoes Plea for Presidential Mercy
- In Race For Better Cell Service, Men Who Climb Towers Pay With Their Lives
- Air Force Pilots Balk at Flying the World’s Most Expensive Fighter Jet
- Patient Died at New York VA Hospital After Alarm Was Ignored
- Watchdog Group Calls for Probe of Lobbyists Behind Congressional Trip to Taiwan
- Billion Dollar Bait & Switch: States Divert Foreclosure Deal Funds
- N.Y. Congressman Will Reimburse Costs for $22,000 Taiwan trip
- Remember Stuxnet? Why the U.S. is Still Vulnerable
- Happy Graduation! Here's The Best, Most Depressing Journalism on Student Debt







1 comments
C O'Donnell
Aug. 6, 2009, 10:41 a.m.
An interesting question—how much of the slow pace of spending (as in signing the contracts or checks) is due to lower than expected bids? How much is simply lethargic bureaucrats?
I can generalize from one nettlesome project in my county, where the engineering estimate used by the MD SHA was $230,000 and the contract was for $97,000. The balance just “sits around” until the state government, Md Dept of Transp, decides to apply it somewhere else, according to the SHA press office. Obviously if $230K is spent on one contract, the “pace of spending” is a lot faster than if $97K is spent and it takes another 6 months for the $133K balance to get applied to something.
While it “sits around” they keep it on the books attached to the county or counties in which the work is thought of as being done, thereby inflating the figures.
Whether deliberate or inadvertent, this isn’t transparency or plain dealing with the citizens.
Commenting on this story is closed.