Kucinich Asks AIG Why It’s Denying Claims From Injured Contractors in Iraq
Heeding a call from Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md), an investigative subcommittee headed by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) said today that it tentatively planned to hold a hearing this summer on whether AIG has routinely blocked medical care for civilian contractors injured in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Kucinich, chair of the domestic policy panel of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, fired off an angry letter to the company, saying that he was "alarmed" by a joint investigation by ProPublica, ABC News and the Los Angeles Times. The investigation found that the troubled insurance giant routinely denied basic medical care such as psychological counseling and even prosthetic legs for civilians injured in the war zone.
Under a federal law known as the Defense Base Act, contractor companies are required to purchase workers compensation insurance for employees deployed to a war zone. AIG dominates the market for such insurance, handling nearly 90 percent of all claims in Iraq. Government audits and inquiries have questioned whether AIG and other carriers charged "excessive" premiums for the insurance. Taxpayers ultimately pay for such insurance as part of the contract price.
"Apparently, AIG is profiting both by charging unreasonably high premiums to contracting firms and by denying or delaying legitimate claims of civilian workers for medical care and other services needed as a result of war zone injuries," Kucinich wrote.
The findings are "all the more disturbing," Kucinich wrote, given that AIG has turned federal supplicant, with promises of almost $70 billion in taxpayer aid to date. "The Subcommittee is interested in obtaining information from AIG shedding light on why there has been such a high rate of denials and unreasonable delays in processing claims, and why it is reaping such huge profits at taxpayers' expense," Kucinich wrote.
AIG said that it would "fully cooperate" with Kucinich's requests for information. The company has said the "vast majority" of claims are paid without dispute "when the proper supporting medical evidence has been received."
War contractors return home with the same scars as soldiers, but without the support.
The Story So Far
Civilian contractors have been an indispensable part of the U.S. war effort in Iraq and Afghanistan, but they have returned home without the support available for troops in uniform.
Tens of thousands of civilians have worked in the two battle zones, delivering fuel, protecting diplomats and translating for troops, among other jobs.
Latest Stories in this Project
- The Other Victims of Battlefield Stress; Defense Contractors' Mental Health Neglected
- Our Articles on Wounded Iraq and Afghan Interpreters -- Now in Arabic
- Foreign Interpreters Hurt in Battle Find U.S. Insurance Benefits Wanting
- Lost in Limbo: Injured Afghan Translators Struggle to Survive
- For AIG's Man in Jordan, War Becomes a Business Opportunity
Our Hottest Stories
- How Wall Street Tobacco Deals Left States With Billions in Toxic Debt
- Q&A: What Can U.S. Health Care Learn from the Ebola Outbreak?
- Report: Drillers Illegally Using Diesel Fuel to Frack
- Leaked Docs Show Spyware Used to Snoop on U.S. Computers
- Government Will Withhold One-Third of the Records from Database of Physician Payments
- What to Look For In Dueling Autopsies of Michael Brown
- Illinois Suspends Medical License of Leading Prescriber of Antipsychotic Drugs
- The Best Reporting on Federal Push to Militarize Local Police
- Q&A: The Hidden Costs of Tobacco Debt
- Pro-Troop Charity Shoots Back