Most Stimulus Money for Repaving Roads
Less than 6 percent of the stimulus money approved for highway projects so far is going toward new construction, according to a ProPublica analysis of federal transportation data. The vast majority, about 76 percent, will be spent repaving and widening roads.
The details come from an updated list, released yesterday, of 2,651 projects approved for funding by the U.S. Department of Transportation. We first reported on the data last month after President Obama announced the 2,000th stimulus transportation project. Since then, more projects have been given the green light, and DOT has committed more than $9 billion, or about one-third of the stimulus money for highways.
"The primary goal of the [American Recovery and Reinvestment Act] is to put people back to work and create jobs," DOT spokesman Lori Irving said. "Small projects, like resurfacing and widening, create jobs. In addition, the first set of projects advanced were those that were easiest to move, which tends to be smaller resurfacing projects. We expect to see a greater percentage of larger projects in the next set."
Other highlights:
- With a come-from-behind sprint reminiscent of Mine That Bird's victory at the Kentucky Derby on Saturday, Idaho -- which had no projects approved two weeks ago -- now leads the pack with 77 percent of its highway funding approved.
- Only one state, Virginia, hasn't had any projects approved. The commonwealth got a late start, with its transportation board meeting to approve projects in mid-April.
- The most expensive job is a $190 million project to widen an HOV lane on Interstate 405 near Los Angeles.
See how much progress your state has made.
Officials have struggled to spend the nearly $800 billion stimulus package quickly and effectively.
Latest Stories in this Project
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- The 182 Percent Loan: How Installment Lenders Put Borrowers in a World of Hurt
- IRS Office That Targeted Tea Party Also Disclosed Confidential Docs From Conservative Groups
- Medicare Drug Program Fails to Monitor Prescribers, Putting Seniors and Disabled at Risk
- On Victory Drive, Soldiers Defeated by Debt
- The Most Important #Muckreads on Rape in the Military
- Everything We Know About What’s Happened Under Sequestration
- The Story Behind Our Hospital Interactive
- Is Obama Delivering on His Promise of a “21st Century” Approach to Drugs?
- Lifting the Veil on Dangerous Prescribing
- FAQ: What You Need to Know About Prescriber Checkup
- IRS Office That Targeted Tea Party Also Disclosed Confidential Docs From Conservative Groups
- The 182 Percent Loan: How Installment Lenders Put Borrowers in a World of Hurt
- Everything We Know About What’s Happened Under Sequestration
- On Victory Drive, Soldiers Defeated by Debt
- Medicare Drug Program Fails to Monitor Prescribers, Putting Seniors and Disabled at Risk
- Is Obama Delivering on His Promise of a “21st Century” Approach to Drugs?
- How the IRS’s Nonprofit Division Got So Dysfunctional
- Intern vs. Mayor: Battle Bares Bloomberg's Argument for Secrecy
- The Most Important #Muckreads on Rape in the Military
- How We Analyzed Medicare’s Drug Data
1 comments
Eric Sundquist
May 22, 2009, 12:44 a.m.
1. Widening roads IS new construction—new capacity in planning terms.
2. Lists from DOTs make it very difficult to determine what is new capacity and what isn’t. For example, the largest project in Wisconsin, $100 million for interchange rebuilds on I-94 between Milwaukee and the Illinois line, is billed as reconstruction, but each interchange is being altered to accommodate additional travel lanes soon, so it really is new capacity.
3. New highway capacity is antithetical to the administration’s goals on climate and on more efficient urban transportation.
4. For some reason, the Pro Publica list has none of the big ticket projects for Wisconsin, though these were approved in March by the legislature.
Commenting on this story is closed.