New Allegations Against Sen. Stevens
It’s been a fun few days in the criminal case of Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK).
The senior senator from Alaska was charged last month for not disclosing $250,000 in gifts from an Alaskan oil company. His lawyers have been pushing to get the trial started right away, and to move it to Alaska. They also argued yesterday that the prosecution of Stevens was trampling the blessed independence of the legislative branch. (Stevens has also said he’s innocent.)
Prosecutors have pushed back and last night offered up a near-avalanche of new allegations. After last month detailing an alleged home makeover and cut-rate Mustang, prosecutors now claim (PDF) that the oil company, VECO, also plied Stevens with a Jeep Grand Cherokee for his daughter and a job for his grandson.
Prosecutors also point to a suspicious 2001 $5,000 Florida real estate investment with a “personal friend.” That friend, a partner of the company that developed the property, allegedly gave Stevens a $31,000 no-interest loan to help him purchase the condo. Stevens did not disclose the loan on his Senate disclosure forms, prosecutors write. Six months after Stevens put only $5,000 down, the friend allegedly helped arrange for another buyer to buy the property at a $130,000 profit for Stevens.
Then there’s a generator. The motions (PDF) quote an e-mail Stevens sent in 1999:
“Incidentally, I asked Bill Allen to hook up a generator to our chalet for Y2K – JUST IN CASE!!”
According to prosecutors, Stevens got his generator, and as with the rest of the gifts, seems to have forgotten to mention it on his Senate disclosure forms.
Prosecutors also point out another thing that caught our eye. They quote (PDF) two e-mails Stevens allegedly sent last year to somebody—identified as “Person A”—who was about to testify in front of a grand jury on the case.
“I hope we can work something out to make sure you aren’t led astray on this occasion,” Stevens wrote (PDF) in the first e-mail.
Stevens followed up with a second e-mail, complete with a helpful tip: “don’t answer questions you don’t KNOW the answers to.”
Capitalization, as the prosecutor’s motion notes, in the original.
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- Donations to Scott Walker Flagged as Potential Fraud
- In Race For Better Cell Service, Men Who Climb Towers Pay With Their Lives
- Billion Dollar Bait & Switch: States Divert Foreclosure Deal Funds
- Pardon Attorney Torpedoes Plea for Presidential Mercy
- Patient Died at New York VA Hospital After Alarm Was Ignored
- Introducing the ProPublica Patient Harm Community on Facebook
- Got Student Loans? Share Your Documents With Us
- Built for a Simpler Era, OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die
- Remember Stuxnet? Why the U.S. is Still Vulnerable
- Congressional Leader Calls for Investigation of the Pardon Office
- Donations to Scott Walker Flagged as Potential Fraud
- Pardon Attorney Torpedoes Plea for Presidential Mercy
- In Race For Better Cell Service, Men Who Climb Towers Pay With Their Lives
- Air Force Pilots Balk at Flying the World’s Most Expensive Fighter Jet
- Watchdog Group Calls for Probe of Lobbyists Behind Congressional Trip to Taiwan
- Patient Died at New York VA Hospital After Alarm Was Ignored
- Billion Dollar Bait & Switch: States Divert Foreclosure Deal Funds
- N.Y. Congressman Will Reimburse Costs for $22,000 Taiwan trip
- Remember Stuxnet? Why the U.S. is Still Vulnerable
- Happy Graduation! Here's The Best, Most Depressing Journalism on Student Debt






