NYC Council to Hold Hearing on Gas Drilling Near City Water Supply
Sept. 4: This post has been corrected.
New York City officials who last month called for a ban on natural gas drilling near the city’s upstate reservoirs have taken the next step in what they argue is a fight to protect the city’s drinking water from contamination. Yesterday, City Council Environmental Protection Committee Chairman James Gennaro announced (PDF) that his committee will hold an emergency public hearing next week to discuss the safety of the drilling and hear public concerns.
Gennaro’s hearing follows an July 18 letter (PDF) the New York City Department of Environmental Protection sent to state environmental officials challenging the state’s assertion that drilling in the Marcellus Shale would not contaminate the city’s unique, unfiltered water system, which serves 9 million New Yorkers. The letter demanded a one-mile protective buffer around each of the city’s reservoirs. At the time, Gennaro argued for even tighter regulation, calling for a total moratorium on drilling in the Catskill watershed, an area that supplies most of the city’s water and covers most of the shale.
“Gas drilling in the middle of our drinking water supply is one of the most potentially harmful policies to come out of Albany with regard to our health, our environment and our wallets,” Chairman Gennaro said yesterday.
Witnesses at next week’s hearing will include representatives from the EPA, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the New York State Department of Health. The meeting is scheduled for 1 p.m. on Wednesday, Sept. 10 on the 14th floor of 250 Broadway, across from City Hall.
Correction: This article originally stated that the letter sent from the New York City Department of Environmental Protection to New York state officials was dated Aug. 6. It was dated July 18.
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- Time Out: Federal Complaint Alleges Rampant Abuse in Texas Truancy Program
- Bank of America Lied to Homeowners and Rewarded Foreclosures, Former Employees Say
- Worried about the Mass Surveillance? How to Practice Safer Communication
- Walmart Accepted Clothing from Banned Bangladesh Factories
- Four Years Ago Obama Promised to Investigate Afghan Massacre. Has Anything Happened Since?
- When Interns Should be Paid: A #ProjectIntern Explainer
- Without a Final Map, New York Rebuilds on Uncertain Ground
- Five Ways Congress is Trying to Curb Rape in the Military
- Objection Overruled: Top Prosecutor Must Testify in Wrongful Conviction Case
- Rape and Other Sexual Violence Prevalent in Juvenile Justice System
- Bank of America Lied to Homeowners and Rewarded Foreclosures, Former Employees Say
- The NSA Black Hole: 5 Basic Things We Still Don’t Know About the Agency's Snooping
- Walmart Accepted Clothing from Banned Bangladesh Factories
- The Best Stories on the Government’s Growing Surveillance
- Worried about the Mass Surveillance? How to Practice Safer Communication
- Betting Against the Future: How Industry Loses When Interns Go Unpaid
- Four Years Ago Obama Promised to Investigate Afghan Massacre. Has Anything Happened Since?
- Five Ways Congress is Trying to Curb Rape in the Military
- A Father’s Day Remembrance
- Unpaid Interns Win Major Ruling in 'Black Swan' Case — Now What?







1 comments
Laurie
Sept. 3, 2008, 9:15 p.m.
Could the writer clarify the statement:
“Gennaro’s hearing follows an Aug. 6 letter (PDF) the New York City Department of Environmental Protection sent to state environmental officials…”
The PDF linked in the word “letter” is not an August 6 letter but the famous 7/18 letter.
Thank you.
Commenting on this story is closed.