ProPublica’s FAQ for Recovery.gov
While it’s fabulous that the stimulus oversight board has made so much data available on Recovery.gov, understanding it all can be a daunting task. In response to some of the questions we’ve had from reporters about the data and Recovery.gov, we’ve compiled a comprehensive FAQ. (This one also pulls together previous posts we’ve done answering questions.) If you have other questions, please send them our way. If you’d like to join our email list for reporters covering the stimulus, just e-mail us.
Where do I search for a recipient?
It was not obvious to us, but you can search for recipients on Recovery.gov. At the top right of the site’s homepage is a search box with a drop-down menu in front of it. Click on the drop-down menu, and choose "Recipient Reports Only" and then type the recipient name in the search box.
In the results list, you’ll see different headers. For details about a recipient’s project, click "Project Summary."
You’ll get a summary of that project. Keep in mind that a recipient might have more than one project.
Where do I get all the data for my state?
Go to the Download Center. You can get there a couple of ways:
To get national data, you have to pull separate files for Contracts, Grants and Loans. Unlike its first data release, the recovery board provided data in a variety of ways. (Thank you!) For most folks, the csv file is the easiest because you can open it in Microsoft Excel. There’s some formatting in the xls file that may make some of your computers unhappy.
To get data for your state, click the drop-down menu in the data box on the bottom of the Download Center page and choose state summaries:
Click GO and you’ll get a list of state files:
It’s a good idea to read the data users guide before (PDF) diving into the data. It may not be obvious what data is in a field based on its header. Also, some fields use special codes that you need to be able to interpret.
Why do different recipients have the same DUNS number?
Actually, they don’t. That’s why it’s important to understand what every field in the data means. A DUNS number is a unique nine-digit number that is used to identify a company or an organization. The numbers are issued by Dun and Bradstreet, a company that provides business information for credit and marketing.
DUNS numbers can be useful if you’re trying to find information on a particular company. For more information on how to background a company, check out ProPublica’s tip sheet.
The second column or field in the database is called recipient role —that tells you whether the data is for the prime recipient (P), a sub-recipient (S), a prime vendor (PV), or a sub-vendor (SV).
The recipient DUNS is for the prime recipient, the sub-recipient DUNS is for the sub-recipient, but the recipient name could be for either, depending on what type of record it is.
Where can I search for a DUNS number?
You can search by DUNS number for free here.
Why is the government spending $250,000 per job created?
It’s not. If you look at the map on Recovery.gov and search for any location, a little black box will come up in the lower left-hand corner reporting the number of awards, amount and jobs reported. But simply dividing the amount of money and number of jobs created or saved isn’t an accurate measure. The amount reported here is the total that’s been awarded for the project. Some of the recipients have only recently received the money and haven’t had a chance to spend it, or create jobs yet. Also, keep in mind that the money for any project is not just spent on workers. Road project money goes to pay for supplies like cement and rebar. It also funds tools and heavy equipment. All of which may create jobs down the line.
How much money has my member of Congress obtained for my district?
Getting an accurate picture of spending by congressional district is difficult. Right now, large sums of education and energy money have gone to state agencies, which will distribute that money statewide. So if you zoom to California, it looks like Rep. Doris Matsui—whose district includes Sacramento—has brought in $3.6 billion while Rep. Xavier Becerra—whose district includes Los Angeles—has brought in only $127 million.
Here are more FAQs from our stimulus-covering friend, Sarah Cohen, a journalism professor at Duke University’s Sanford School of Public Policy.
What’s the difference between "agency reported" and "recipient reported" data?
Recovery.gov lets you look at data as reported by the agency or as reported by the recipient. Understanding the flow of money—and the flow of data—can help you pick which one to use.
Agency summary reports:
These are the weekly reports shown as spreadsheets on Recovery.gov when you choose to download "Agency Reported Data" from the Download Center on the FAQ page. The spreadsheets have several pages—the one that shows spending gives the direct amount spent by the agency on stimulus-related projects. It includes all spending, including salaries for employees, grants, loans and contracts, but has very little detail—usually only to the state level.
This is the data you see if you click on the "Agency Reported" tab on the home page map. This, too, is money flowing directly from a federal agency, often to state governments that will then distribute it to their own contractors or localities. Recovery.gov has removed the option to download this data.
Contracts here come from the Federal Procurement Data System, which provides a spreadsheet of stimulus contracts updated weekly.
Grants and loans come from USAspending.gov, and are updated every few weeks, though some agencies are usually slow. The government limits you to downloading 1,000 of these at a time. Go to "Advanced Search for Recipients," then choose the Recovery Act under "Business Fund Indicator" at the bottom.
Some spending is dropped out here, notably salaries for federal employees, such as inspector general’s staff and census workers.
Every quarter, the recipients of grants, loans and contracts have to report on the money they received and where they spent it. These are the reports that show up if you click on the "Recipient Reported" tab on the home page map.
Not every program is included in the recipient reports. Generally, if a state gets money from the federal government and gives it directly to people rather than other organizations, it doesn’t have to report what happened. This knocks out large stimulus programs such as unemployment insurance and Medicaid.
Either the recipient or the organization that got money from it has to report how much it has gotten. There is very little information at this "sub-recipient" level, but it does give you the key things everyone wants – a locality and an amount of money that has been spent. In return, though, you lose yet more of the money at this level: Anything done directly by the recipient’s employees, for example, is excluded. So a state hiring prison guards isn’t in the sub-recipient data – the money trail ends in the state capital, even if those guards are in different local areas.
What are the different amounts in the reports?
Depending on which report you look at, you might see "obligations," money "available," "outlays," "award amount" or "expended." Here are some guidelines about what these mean:
- "Obligations" and "available" are often used interchangeably. The terms refer to money that the agency has committed to a specific project and a specific recipient, but may not have actually paid yet. It’s the equivalent of hiring a contractor to fix your kitchen: you won’t pay until the work is done, but you have to put aside that money, and you will have to pay it unless something goes horribly wrong. In turn, the contractor orders supplies and starts working without having been paid for the end product. All of the "agency-reported" data from the two standard systems (Federal Procurement Data System and USAspending.gov) are obligations. The agency reports that say "available" are also obligations. State governments can spend obligated money before the Treasury has actually moved dollars into their accounts.
- "Outlays" are the amounts the federal government has actually paid in hard money.
- Award amount: These are supposed to be the flip side of obligations, reported by the first recipient, but the government wasn’t that clear on what the recipients should report, so it could be somewhat garbled.
- Expended: This is the amount that a recipient has actually paid to some other organization or to employees.
Which dollar figure should I use?
It is really up to you, and depends on what you want to do. If you want the most local information available, you’d use the award amount from sub-recipients and the remaining amount expended from the prime recipients in your area.
Measuring economic impact is harder. For instance, unemployment insurance probably doesn’t help the economy much until the jobless person actually gets a check. But a contractor can start hiring and paying workers on the promise of money from the government.
How can I get the reports for my county or metro area?
Right now, it’s not in reported data from recipients or sub-recipients. Instead, the ZIP code of the "place of performance" is listed in the database.
On the map, you can choose "Funding" on the upper right, then choose "County" and zoom in on your county. (This is for either recipient- or agency-reported data). Unfortunately, that’s all you can do – you can’t drill in right now to see what those contracts and grants are, or where the money is coming from. Instead, you can sort the downloadable Excel files by ZIP code to get the ones in your area.
Officials have struggled to spend the nearly $800 billion stimulus package quickly and effectively.
Latest Stories in this Project
Our Hottest Stories
- Segregation Now
- MIA In The War On Cancer: Where Are The Low-Cost Treatments?
- Long After Sandy, Red Cross Post-Storm Spending Still a Black Box
- Even After Doctors Are Sanctioned or Arrested, Medicare Keeps Paying
- Shake-Up Inside Forensic Credentialing Org
- The U.S. Government: Paying to Undermine Internet Security, Not to Fix It
- Republicans Say No to CDC Gun Violence Research
- Meet the Doctor Who Gave $1 Million of His Own Money to Keep His Gun Research Going