The 30-Day Bank
Normally, when the FDIC announces a Friday bank failure it has already found a buyer for the insured deposits and assets of the failed institution. Come Monday morning, life goes on as normal for the failed bank’s customers, except that their bank’s name has changed.
But when the New Frontier Bank of Greeley, Colorado failed last Friday, the FDIC could not find a buyer. Instead it employed a seldom used power to create its own temporary bank that the FDIC is calling the Deposit Insurance National Bank of Greeley. How rare is this maneuver? The last time the FDIC used the legal provision that allows it to create its own bank was in 1982.
In that case, the FDIC created a bank to process the failure of Oklahoma-based Penn Square. Congress gave the FDIC the power to create its own banks to resolve failed institutions back in 1933, but by 1982 it was used so infrequently that in the preceding 20 years the agency had only created four of them.
The FDIC expects the newly minted National Bank of Greeley to remain open for approximately 30 days. This presumably will give insured depositors enough time to open accounts at other institutions. The FDIC has contracted out running the new Greeley Bank to San Francisco-based Bank of the West, perhaps because the FDIC doesn’t have enough staff or expertise to do it on its own. The FDIC is presently on a hiring binge to recruit new staff to help in dealing with the nation’s growing list of troubled financial institutions.
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- Donations to Scott Walker Flagged as Potential Fraud
- In Race For Better Cell Service, Men Who Climb Towers Pay With Their Lives
- Billion Dollar Bait & Switch: States Divert Foreclosure Deal Funds
- Pardon Attorney Torpedoes Plea for Presidential Mercy
- Patient Died at New York VA Hospital After Alarm Was Ignored
- Introducing the ProPublica Patient Harm Community on Facebook
- Finding Oscar: Massacre, Memory and Justice in Guatemala
- Built for a Simpler Era, OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die
- Got Student Loans? Share Your Documents With Us
- Remember Stuxnet? Why the U.S. is Still Vulnerable
- Donations to Scott Walker Flagged as Potential Fraud
- Pardon Attorney Torpedoes Plea for Presidential Mercy
- In Race For Better Cell Service, Men Who Climb Towers Pay With Their Lives
- Air Force Pilots Balk at Flying the World’s Most Expensive Fighter Jet
- Watchdog Group Calls for Probe of Lobbyists Behind Congressional Trip to Taiwan
- Patient Died at New York VA Hospital After Alarm Was Ignored
- Billion Dollar Bait & Switch: States Divert Foreclosure Deal Funds
- Broadcasters Sue to...Block Transparency
- Happy Graduation! Here's The Best, Most Depressing Journalism on Student Debt
- Remember Stuxnet? Why the U.S. is Still Vulnerable







1 comments
julian bradbrook
May 4, 2009, 4:44 a.m.
I am from the UK and the Govt over here has had to bail out so many banks within the last 6 months. They have basically nationalised large sections of the banking industry - if they had not done this, the results would have been as dramatic as they would have been devastating.
If the banks recover well from this current crisis then the tax payer may do well from this intervention as share prices increase and the Govts holdings are able to be sold for profit to pay back tax payers. This could take a very long time but it does mean that savers’ deposits with banks are made much safer.
Commenting on this story is closed.