Too Much Money to Go Around?
The stimulus bill is supposed to infuse the economy with much-needed cash to combat the economic downturn. But in some cases, the stimulus could present existing government bureaucracies with the opposite problem: too much money.
The Wall Street Journal reported today that at least a few agencies simply don’t have the infrastructure or know-how to disseminate funds they’ve already got, let alone the extra cash expected to be unleashed next week by the stimulus (check out our latest chart).
The Department of Energy is the biggest culprit, according to the Journal. That department would receive a $40 billion stimulus injection—nearly twice their annual budget. Energy’s bureaucracies already grind slowly in the face of tight regulations.
To fulfill the role carved out for the department by their ambitious new allocation, the Energy Department would “dramatically change how it does business…...They are going to need more people, more oversight and more freedom to waive regulations,” Karen Harbert, a former department official told the Journal. But even their supposedly cutting-edge programs that attend to the new mission of finding novel energy sources and weaning the country off fossil fuels function like the dated bureaucracy.
For instance, their loan-guarantee program, a two-year-old office that backs companies in the clean or renewable energy business, “has yet to approve a single project,” the Journal reports.
Sage Electrochromics, Inc., a Minnesota-based maker of glass that keeps buildings cool by darkening to keep out sunlight, has been chasing a loan guarantee for as long as the program has been operational, along with about a dozen other companies. Sage and some of the other companies report stringent regulations and costly compliance at every corner.
The Department of Energy isn’t alone. The Journal found “an obscure Commerce Department office with a $19 million budget and fewer than 20 grant officers [that] could end up in charge of $7 billion in grants to expand internet access in rural areas.”
The new administration seems intent on helping the Energy Department transition from its old mission—of overseeing nuclear weapons development—to the newer types of projects: President Obama appointed Steven Chu, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist, to lead the Department of Energy and has considered moving some of the department’s portfolio to the Department of Defense.
Shortly after his confirmation as Energy secretary, an optimistic Chu told the New York Times that “solving the world’s energy and environment problems would require Nobel-level breakthroughs.” But in his sprawling department, breakthroughs in accounting may have to come first.
The Department of Energy is considering borrowing employees from other agencies with “a better track record” on distributing grants and contracts, Chu told the Journal.
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- Donations to Scott Walker Flagged as Potential Fraud
- In Race For Better Cell Service, Men Who Climb Towers Pay With Their Lives
- Billion Dollar Bait & Switch: States Divert Foreclosure Deal Funds
- Pardon Attorney Torpedoes Plea for Presidential Mercy
- Patient Died at New York VA Hospital After Alarm Was Ignored
- Finding Oscar: Massacre, Memory and Justice in Guatemala
- Introducing the ProPublica Patient Harm Community on Facebook
- Built for a Simpler Era, OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die
- Got Student Loans? Share Your Documents With Us
- Remember Stuxnet? Why the U.S. is Still Vulnerable
- Donations to Scott Walker Flagged as Potential Fraud
- Pardon Attorney Torpedoes Plea for Presidential Mercy
- In Race For Better Cell Service, Men Who Climb Towers Pay With Their Lives
- Air Force Pilots Balk at Flying the World’s Most Expensive Fighter Jet
- Watchdog Group Calls for Probe of Lobbyists Behind Congressional Trip to Taiwan
- Patient Died at New York VA Hospital After Alarm Was Ignored
- Billion Dollar Bait & Switch: States Divert Foreclosure Deal Funds
- Broadcasters Sue to...Block Transparency
- Happy Graduation! Here's The Best, Most Depressing Journalism on Student Debt
- Remember Stuxnet? Why the U.S. is Still Vulnerable







1 comments
Richard Rosenthal
Feb. 17, 2009, 1:38 p.m.
I think it would be wise for the DOE to gather its scientists and other interested parties to establish a mix of technical areas to fund. I do not think any of these funds should go to nuclear or fossil fuel related programs as billions have already gone this way with little to show for it.
The management of harvested energy from the sun(solar, wind etc.) tides and geothermal requires that we plan the big picture view of how this may happen. Can we expect 50% of our future energy needs to come from our backyards? or will this number be larger or smaller? Clearly if conservation, electric vehicles, home charging stations and energy storage is possible at most home sites then funding for the standards, building codes modification, R&D, and actual equipment that could be part of a home purchase should be considered.
There is a lot to be considered and we have squandered too many years so the best way to catch up is by working smart and planning by experts in the field of energy.
BTW I would not expect much value in the opinions of fossil fuel companies and fossil fueled or nuclear power industries.
Commenting on this story is closed.