Where Things Stand: Obama and Transparency
Editor’s note: As part of our year-end coverage, we’re checking in on the latest on each of our in-depth stories.
Will the new administration open the door on government as President-elect Barack Obama promised during his campaign? He’s had some missteps along the way when it comes to transparency, but signs are good that U.S. citizens will know more about the goings on of their government than they have for the last eight years.
Mr. Obama’s transition team already has put documents from meetings with non-government groups, including special interest groups, on its Web site. (We asked them a few weeks ago whether they plan to add information from meetings with government agencies, but we haven’t heard back.)
Critics slammed the Obama team recently for failing to immediately release information about communications with now-infamous Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich. The Obama team eventually released a memo (PDF) from Greg Craig, Obama’s choice for White House counsel, describing limited contacts between the transition team and Gov. Blagojevich’s staff.
What we hear from the new president on Jan. 20 may very well set the tone for the next administration. In an opinion piece (requires free registration) in the Dec. 8 issue of Legal Times, the former director of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Information and Privacy, Daniel J. Metcalfe, provided suggested wording for the new president’s inaugural address:
“And it is time for the excessive government secrecy of the past to give way to government transparency in the future—so that all Americans can learn what their government is doing in their name and participate fully in our great democracy. Let us shine a bright light on government, in a variety of ways, and make this the most transparent administration in history.” Any language along these lines, spoken on Day One of the Obama administration, would go a long, long way.
Metcalfe, who is now executive director of the Collaboration on Government Secrecy at American University’s Washington College of Law, also urged that the new administration reverse the Freedom of Information memo issued by John Ashcroft in 2001 telling staff that they would be supported in any decisions to withhold information.
We’ll know more once the new administration is in place, and we’ll be following transparency issues—good and bad—as Mr. Obama and his staff get to work.
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- Bank of America Lied to Homeowners and Rewarded Foreclosures, Former Employees Say
- Time Out: Federal Complaint Alleges Rampant Abuse in Texas Truancy Program
- In Westchester, Progress on Housing and the Specter of Another Fight
- Worried about the Mass Surveillance? How to Practice Safer Communication
- When Interns Should be Paid: A #ProjectIntern Explainer
- Walmart Accepted Clothing from Banned Bangladesh Factories
- Without a Final Map, New York Rebuilds on Uncertain Ground
- Objection Overruled: Top Prosecutor Must Testify in Wrongful Conviction Case
- Rape and Other Sexual Violence Prevalent in Juvenile Justice System
- Remember When the Patriot Act Debate Was All About Library Records?
- Bank of America Lied to Homeowners and Rewarded Foreclosures, Former Employees Say
- The NSA Black Hole: 5 Basic Things We Still Don’t Know About the Agency's Snooping
- Walmart Accepted Clothing from Banned Bangladesh Factories
- The Best Stories on the Government’s Growing Surveillance
- Worried about the Mass Surveillance? How to Practice Safer Communication
- Betting Against the Future: How Industry Loses When Interns Go Unpaid
- Remember When the Patriot Act Debate Was All About Library Records?
- A Father’s Day Remembrance
- Unpaid Interns Win Major Ruling in 'Black Swan' Case — Now What?
- Housing Crisis: Widespread Discrimination; Little Taste for Enforcement






