Preview: Financial Crisis Panel’s Huge Task, Small Budget, Unanswered Questions
The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, a 10-person panel tasked with investigating the causes of the financial crisis, is gearing up for Wednesday, when it begins a second round of public hearings with financial executives, regulators and experts.
As has been reported but bears repeating, the panel has a big job and a small budget. The commission's chairman, Phil Angelides, has pointed out that the Lehman Brothers examiner's report -- an investigation into what happened with a single company -- cost $38 million and took 15 months. By comparison, the commission, whose job is to investigate the entire financial crisis for the public record, has an $8 million budget and Dec. 15 deadline for reporting its findings to Congress. Recent reports say the crisis panel has been beset with internal disagreements and staffing delays.
As part of its formidable to-do list, the panel has promised to look into the bankers, into the extent of deceptive accounting ($) at financial firms, into the mortgage bubble and into subprime lending at Citigroup. Among the people to be questioned this week are former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan, former Citigroup CEO Chuck Prince and former Citi chairman Robert Rubin -- who as Treasury secretary during the Clinton administration played a "key role in financial deregulation." Current and former heads of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency will also face questioning, as will former executives from mortgage giant Fannie Mae and two former Fannie regulators.
As for what to expect: Greenspan has laid out his position on the financial crisis in a paper for the Brookings Institution (read the summary). In recent interviews he has stressed that the problem is not the markets, but that no one understood the risks that were being taken enough to step in. "We have to work our way back to understanding what went on," he told ABC News -- troubling, coming as it does from someone who spent more than two decades as the nation's chief financial regulator. He also stressed "more required capital" for financial firms, an idea that seems to be popular in principle, but only so long as regulators have discretion and specific numbers aren't written into legislation.
Former Citi execs Prince and Rubin will likely be in the headlines as well, as the panel questions them on the risky lending practices that led to $45 billion in government bailouts for Citigroup (see our bailout page on Citi). In 2007, shaking off concerns about the mortgage lending boom, Prince famously told the Financial Times, "When the music stops, in terms of liquidity, things will be complicated. But as long as the music is playing, you’ve got to get up and dance. We’re still dancing."
Here's the full agenda (PDF) for the last half of the week. We'll also be following news of the hearings on the blog.
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- The 182 Percent Loan: How Installment Lenders Put Borrowers in a World of Hurt
- IRS Office That Targeted Tea Party Also Disclosed Confidential Docs From Conservative Groups
- Medicare Drug Program Fails to Monitor Prescribers, Putting Seniors and Disabled at Risk
- On Victory Drive, Soldiers Defeated by Debt
- The Most Important #Muckreads on Rape in the Military
- Everything We Know About What’s Happened Under Sequestration
- The Story Behind Our Hospital Interactive
- Is Obama Delivering on His Promise of a “21st Century” Approach to Drugs?
- Lifting the Veil on Dangerous Prescribing
- FAQ: What You Need to Know About Prescriber Checkup
- IRS Office That Targeted Tea Party Also Disclosed Confidential Docs From Conservative Groups
- The 182 Percent Loan: How Installment Lenders Put Borrowers in a World of Hurt
- Everything We Know About What’s Happened Under Sequestration
- On Victory Drive, Soldiers Defeated by Debt
- How the IRS’s Nonprofit Division Got So Dysfunctional
- Medicare Drug Program Fails to Monitor Prescribers, Putting Seniors and Disabled at Risk
- Is Obama Delivering on His Promise of a “21st Century” Approach to Drugs?
- Intern vs. Mayor: Battle Bares Bloomberg's Argument for Secrecy
- The Most Important #Muckreads on Rape in the Military
- The Story Behind Our Hospital Interactive







2 comments
Neelima June
April 6, 2010, 3:53 p.m.
What I find very disturbing about Mr. Greenspan’s comments, is that although he was the top guy, he did not make it his responsibility to find out and understand what was happening in the financial world that caused the crisis. He essentially shirked his responsibility to monitor everything that was not “up-to-snuff”. He should be reprimanded and made to pay a fine for criminal neglect of duty. Of course, that means that the Congressional committee in charge at the time would also have been responsible for what was going on. All in all, our leaders failed us, and got away scott-free. Hurray for Capitalism!
Norman Morley
April 6, 2010, 7:50 p.m.
I honestly don’t believe anything will of substance will come of this inquiry considering the small budget as well as the bickering within the panel. As has been the case so far, the individuals interviewed, will offer revisionists type of testimony, profess ignorance of any roll, that they knew of or acted upon the debacle that took place. There also seems to be a conflict of interests among some of the members of the inquiry board. Just plain window dressing, stick together, for if anyone spills the beans, each & everyone will be in jail for the rest of their lives.
Commenting on this story is closed.