ProPublica

Journalism in the Public Interest

Cancel

Republicans Getting More Campaign Cash From Wall Street

Yet another vote to move financial reform forward in the Senate failed on Tuesday, when lawmakers voted 57-41 to block debate on Sen. Chris Dodd's bill.

For the second day in a row, Senate Republicans uniformly voted to block the bill. They were joined by a single Democrat, Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska.

(Nelson, as we've noted, had advocated for a derivatives exemption pushed by one of his top campaign donors, Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway. That exemption will apparently not go into the Senate bill.)

But what do Republicans stand to gain from their opposition to the bill?

After all, a recent Washington Post/ABC News poll found that almost two-thirds of Americans favor tougher regulation of Wall Street. Another survey, conducted by Pew, had similar findings. In that survey, 61 percent of Americans favored stricter regulation of financial firms, up from 54 percent in October.

With elections coming up in November, Republicans' decision to block financial reform didn't quite make sense to me. And then I read in Tuesday's Wall Street Journal that "for the first time since 2004, the biggest Wall Street firms are now giving most of their campaign donations to Republicans."

Of course, campaign donations are always a little tricky. Just because the dollars are pouring in is hardly a sign of quid pro quo. (Is a politician taking a position because of a donor's generous contributions--or is the donor contributing because of the politician's position?)  

Either way, it's worth following the money. And according to the Journal, Republicans are now the favored party of the big financial firms:

A Wall Street Journal analysis of 12 large financial services companies, including J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. shows that they have collectively made $1.4 million in political donations, with 52% going to Republicans so far this year. That's a reversal from last year, according to the most recent round of fund-raising reports covering January, February and March.

Goldman Sachs, for instance, has historically been a strong donor to Democrats. "Since 1989, there has never been an election in which Goldman gave more to Republicans than Democrats," said the Journal, citing the Center for Responsive Politics. But in the first three months of this year, it gave 52 percent of its political action committee donations to Republicans. Morgan Stanley, by contrast, gave 80 percent of its political action committee donations to Republicans in the first quarter of this year.

Democrats have still taken in more donations from Wall Street in the 2009 and 2010 election cycle, according to the Journal, but in the last few months, that trend seems to be reversing. Congressional Republicans may not have much trust from voters, but if donations are any indication, it seems they're winning over Wall Street.

So let me get this straight. Only 52% of the donations are going to Republicans but for the last 2 elections cycles Democrats actually received more from Big Wall street firms than Republicans did? Yet your story title suggests somehow that Republicans disproportionately benefit from these donations. And since when does public opinion dictate legislative direction anyway? (see Obamacare). Try and maintain some objectivity in your reporting. You give creedence to a liberal bias that exists in Journalism today. Not impressed with this story

political atheist

April 28, 2010, 4:48 p.m.

I think the bigger issue is that now more than ever it is evident that both parties are owned by the same corporate interests. The sooner people realize the false left/right paradigm is only a ploy to keep us divided and conquered the sooner this pimp game is exposed. Bankers have been financing both sides of war. (Prescott Bush funded the Nazis) Why would this be any different? After all, they put the “hedge” in “hedge fund.”

So basically, during the worst Wall Street excesses the Dems were getting the lion’s share of the donations. Along with the likes of Barney Franks pushing mortgages for everyone with a pulse, I think we see the real cause of the meltdown. This isn’t exactly the way it gets reported most of the time though.

political atheist,

I think you absolutely positively got it right. The outsiders e.g. people other than business people, politicians, and investors don’t seem to have a clue as to the charade being displayed. The individuals on the panel are saying to themselves,“kiss my ass…I’m Rich.”

Guess they just bet on which way the pendulum will swing.  It’s all the big bidniss following power…there’s no real advantage of one partry to another. They both drop to their knees when the cash cow comes around.  There is no government…just one giant business oligarchy

Well, if some people REALLY followed this Bill, and knew the DETAILS in it, it would be easy to see why it’s being voted against.

Has ANYONE seen a Bill put out by the Obama machine, that did not have a BITE YOU IN THE REAR mechanism?.

Do some digging, and you may have an understanding.
Every Dem Bill has a penalty, or an invasive end to it.
Wake up Am
erica….........stop taking things at MEDIA FACE VALUES.

Get Updates

Stay on top of what we’re working on by subscribing to our email digest.

optional