Close Close Comment Creative Commons Donate Email Add Email Facebook Instagram Facebook Messenger Mobile Nav Menu Podcast Print RSS Search Secure Twitter WhatsApp YouTube
Fall Member Drive Deadline: Friday Support fearless, independent journalism.

Case Farms Responds to Our Story

After our story about the chicken processor’s reliance on immigrant workers, Case Farms issued a statement. Here’s some context that’s missing.

The Case Farms chicken plant in Canton, Ohio (Hector Emanuel, special to ProPublica)

Earlier this week, we published a story in collaboration with The New Yorker about a poultry company named Case Farms, which government officials have called “outrageously dangerous,” and which has repeatedly used immigration status to get rid of workers who fought for higher pay or better conditions.

In response, Case Farms issued a statement, which you can read here. Much of the statement is similar to what Case Farms officials told ProPublica during reporting and was included in the story. ProPublica first approached Case Farms in October and ultimately visited two of the company’s plants and interviewed executives over several hours in person and on the phone. Two New Yorker fact-checkers combed through the story and also spoke with Case Farms managers.

The statement makes a few points that deserve a response:

  • Case Farms said it “has not terminated any workers, or injured workers, who protested vocally, or otherwise, for better pay, benefits or working conditions.” The National Labor Relations Board found that on three occasions Case Farms had unlawfully fired workers for complaining about working conditions or their union activity. You can read those decisions here and here.

  • The company said that in 2016, its chicken catchers made on average $65,000 a year. While Case Farms may employ some of its own catchers, the company’s statement leaves out the fact that it contracts out much of its chicken catching. Workers told us they are paid $2.25 for every 1,000 chickens and, as a crew, can catch about 75,000 chickens a night. If they catch that many every night, which is not guaranteed, they would earn more than $40,000 a year. Here is a letter from some chicken catchers to Case Farms and its contractor reflecting the piece-rate wage.

  • Case Farms said that it’s “not affiliated” with Cal-Clean, the sanitation contractor that employed Osiel López Pérez, a teenager who lost a leg in one of the company’s machines. We noted that in the story but said the contractor was “closely affiliated” for several reasons: In its investigation into López’s accident, the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration noted similarities between the two companies. Cal-Clean’s on-site supervisor had worked at Case Farms for more than 10 years, ultimately serving as sanitation manager before taking on the same role at the contractor. López didn’t recognize the name Cal-Clean when asked by a reporter and identified his employer as Case Farms. Emails obtained as part of the OSHA investigation show that Case Farms had the ability to terminate Cal-Clean employees from working at its plant.

    According to the investigation, Cal-Clean’s sanitation manual still had Case Farms’ name on it. Someone had simply added Cal-Clean’s logo to the bottom. Cal-Clean’s owner Steve Callaghan disputed a comment by Case Farms’ safety manager that the company had “nothing to do” with its procedures and told OSHA they shared responsibility. “We, Cal-Clean and Case, are in this together,” he said. “We, Cal-Clean and Case, are both going to get sued, and rightfully so. A young man lost his leg.” You can read a summary of OSHA’s investigation into Cal-Clean here. The agency’s inspection of Case Farms is not yet public because the poultry company is contesting the fines.

Filed under:

Protect Independent Journalism

This story you’ve just finished was funded by our readers. We hope it inspires you to make a gift to ProPublica so that we can publish more investigations like this one that hold people in power to account and produce real change.

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that produces nonpartisan, evidence-based journalism to expose injustice, corruption and wrongdoing. We were founded over 10 years ago to fill a growing hole in journalism: Newsrooms were (and still are) shrinking, and legacy funding models are failing. Deep-dive reporting like ours is slow and expensive, and investigative journalism is a luxury in many newsrooms today — but it remains as critical as ever to democracy and our civic life. More than a decade (and six Pulitzer Prizes) later, ProPublica has built one of the largest investigative newsrooms in the country. Our work has spurred reform through legislation, at the voting booth and inside our nation’s most important institutions.

Your donation today will help us ensure that we can continue this critical work. From the climate crisis, to racial justice, to wealth inequality and much more, we are busier than ever covering stories you won’t see anywhere else. Make your gift of any amount today and join the tens of thousands of ProPublicans across the country, standing up for the power of independent journalism to produce real, lasting change. Thank you.

Donate Now

Portrait of ProPublica


ProPublica is an independent, nonprofit newsroom that produces investigative journalism with moral force. Learn more.

Latest Stories from ProPublica

Current site Current page