Close Close Comment Creative Commons Donate Email Add Email Facebook Instagram Facebook Messenger Mobile Nav Menu Podcast Print RSS Search Secure Twitter WhatsApp YouTube
Stand up for journalism that holds the powerful to account.

Document Shows NRA Money Helped Its Chief Search for a Personal Mansion

The gun group’s lawyer said “not a cent” of the nonprofit’s money was spent on helping executive Wayne LaPierre’s mansion search. A document we obtained shows that payments were flagged by internal accountants for doing just that.

An accounting document obtained by ProPublica shows that $70,000 of NRA money was transferred to an obscure LLC; its purpose was to help top executive Wayne LaPierre buy a Texas mansion. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

This article was produced in partnership with The Trace.

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as they’re published.

Subscribe to The Trace’s newsletter for the most revealing, must-read reporting on gun issues.

In news reports this week, the National Rifle Association’s outside counsel, William A. Brewer III, has insisted that “not a cent” of the nonprofit’s money was “ultimately spent” on a plan to buy a multimillion-dollar Dallas mansion for top executive Wayne LaPierre.

But a document obtained by ProPublica shows that NRA money was used to help facilitate the purchase of a 10,000-square-foot Texas mansion for LaPierre, setting off alarms within the nonprofit. In response to questions about the transaction, the NRA on Thursday did not provide a comment or say whether the funds were eventually returned.

NRA accountants flagged a $70,000 payment to WBB Investments LLC in a document titled “List of Top Concerns for the Audit Committee.” They asked the audit committee to examine the payment, which they said was not properly documented.

The memo warned of the payment to a company with a “vague description, company didn’t exist and address of business was the home of the Chief Accounting Officer of AcMc” — a reference to Ackerman McQueen, the NRA’s longtime advertising firm.

Ackerman has acknowledged that at the time it was helping LaPierre, who was reportedly concerned about personal security after a mass shooting in Parkland, Florida, find a safe retreat in Dallas. But the accounting record of payment to the affiliated LLC has not been previously reported.

Now, Ackerman has turned over records related to LaPierre’s house search to the New York attorney general’s office, which is investigating whether the NRA violated its tax-exempt status with lavish spending and insider deals. The Wall Street Journal first reported LaPierre’s housing plan, and attributed to an anonymous source a description of a $70,000 transfer of cash from the NRA to an unnamed limited liability company affiliated with Ackerman. Disclosure of the arrangement has escalated tensions between the NRA and the company that was once its most highly paid vendor.

For its part, the NRA maintains that Ackerman conceived and shepherded the idea to purchase the home for LaPierre and his wife, Susan. The plan, the gun group says, was ultimately rejected by the organization after its “full terms” and Ackerman’s intent to use NRA money were disclosed to LaPierre.

According to Ackerman, however, the deal originated with LaPierre. “The truth is that Mr. LaPierre decided to proactively propose his plan to leave his current residence,” the firm said in a statement issued this week. “Acting outside the parties’ Services Agreement, Mr. LaPierre sought the involvement of Ackerman McQueen.”

Emails authored by an Ackerman staffer that were described to The Washington Post demonstrate that Susan LaPierre took an active interest in the luxury home’s layout. “The men’s master bedroom and bathroom need some changes,” the email said. “There isn’t much closet space. Susan will have specific input here and can probably work with the eventual interior designer to get this accomplished.”

According to the Post, the LaPierres sought to close the real estate deal on July 1, 2018. Within the next two weeks, the NRA’s accountants produced their audit committee document flagging the $70,000 transaction.

The entry on a 2018 NRA accounting document that describes the transfer of NRA funds into an LLC. The purpose of the transaction, we now know, was to help Wayne LaPierre purchase a mansion in Dallas.

The NRA accountants did not know at the time the purpose of the $70,000 transaction. According to the document, they viewed the payment as a violation of the NRA’s “accounts payable procedures.”

The NRA and Ackerman worked closely together for almost four decades. The firm shaped the organization’s public image and devised its most memorable ad campaigns, at a cost of tens of millions of dollars annually.

In April, the gun group sued Ackerman in a Virginia state court over its billing practices, and it soon after ended its relationship with the firm. Ackerman denied the allegations, and it eventually responded with a defamation suit against the NRA. The former partners are now tied up in litigation.

Ackerman has been involved in other transactions that benefited LaPierre. In May, according to NRA records anonymously posted online, the firm paid more than half a million dollars for LaPierre’s custom suits and exotic travel.

The audit committee document was part of an effort by NRA accountants last year to address a broad array of questionable transactions and business arrangements that they believed could threaten the organization’s tax-exempt status. The deals involved top NRA executives, favored vendors and consultants. Brewer, the NRA’s outside counsel, at the time called the document “obsolete and misleading.”

This month, ProPublica reported on another document authored by a former senior employee in the NRA’s treasurer’s office. The former employee, who resigned in November, alleged that Brewer tried to impede the accountants’ work. She said that he “intimidated NRA staff and threatened our professional livelihoods,” using coercive tactics such as the compilation of “burn books,” which were filled with sensitive personal information that could be used as leverage against staffers.

Brewer and his firm denied the allegations. A firm partner told ProPublica that “the notion that our research team compiles opposition research, or ‘burn books,’ regarding clients or their employees is simply not true.”

Protect Independent Journalism

This story you’ve just finished was funded by our readers. We hope it inspires you to make a gift to ProPublica so that we can publish more investigations like this one that hold people in power to account and produce real change.

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that produces nonpartisan, evidence-based journalism to expose injustice, corruption and wrongdoing. We were founded over 10 years ago to fill a growing hole in journalism: Newsrooms were (and still are) shrinking, and legacy funding models are failing. Deep-dive reporting like ours is slow and expensive, and investigative journalism is a luxury in many newsrooms today — but it remains as critical as ever to democracy and our civic life. More than a decade (and six Pulitzer Prizes) later, ProPublica has built one of the largest investigative newsrooms in the country. Our work has spurred reform through legislation, at the voting booth and inside our nation’s most important institutions.

Your donation today will help us ensure that we can continue this critical work. From the climate crisis, to racial justice, to wealth inequality and much more, we are busier than ever covering stories you won’t see anywhere else. Make your gift of any amount today and join the tens of thousands of ProPublicans across the country, standing up for the power of independent journalism to produce real, lasting change. Thank you.

Donate Now

Mike Spies

Mike Spies was a reporter based in ProPublica’s New York City newsroom.

Latest Stories from ProPublica

Current site Current page