Getting the
agencies responsible for national security to communicate better was one of the
main reasons the Department of Homeland Security was created after the Sept.
11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

But
according to a recent report from the department’s
inspector general, one aspect of this mission remains far from accomplished.

DHS has
spent $430 million over the past nine years to provide radios tuned to a
common, secure channel to 123,000 employees across the country. Problem is, no one seems to know how to use them.

Only one
of 479 DHS employees surveyed by the inspector general’s office was actually
able to use the common channel, according to the report. Most of those surveyed
— 72 percent — didn’t even know the common channel existed. Another
25 percent knew the channel existed but weren’t able to find it; 3 percent were
able to find an older common channel, but not the current one.

The
investigators also found that more than half of the radios did not have the
settings for the common channel programmed into them. Only 20 percent of radios
tested had all the correct settings.

The
radios are supposed to help employees of Customs and Border Patrol, the
Transportation Security Administration, the Coast Guard, Immigration and
Customs Enforcement, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Secret
Service, and other agencies with DHS communicate during crises, as well as
normal operations.

DHS
officials did not immediately respond to questions from ProPublica about what
effect the radio problems could have on how the agency handles an emergency.

The $430 million paid for radio infrastructure and maintenance as well as the actual radios.

In a
response letter to the report, Jim H. Crumpacker, the
Department of Homeland Security’s liaison between the Government Accountability
Office and the inspector general, wrote that DHS had made “significant strides”
in improving emergency communications since 2003. But he acknowledged that DHS
“has had some challenges in achieving Department-wide interoperable
communications goals.”

The
recent inspector general’s report is the latest in a string of critical
assessments DHS has received on its efforts to improve communication between
federal, state and local agencies. The Government Accountability Office reported in 2007 that the Department of Homeland Security had “generally
not achieved” this  goal.

DHS has assigned
a blizzard of offices and committees to oversee its radio effort since 2003, which
the inspector general’s report claimed had “hindered DHS’ ability to provide
effective oversight.”

Also, none
of the entities “had the authority to implement and enforce their
recommendations,” the report concluded. Tanya Callender,
a spokeswoman for the inspector general, said the current office overseeing the
effort hadn’t been given the authority to force agencies to use the common
channel or even to provide instructions for programming the radios.

The
inspector general recommended DHS standardize its policies regarding radios,
which DHS agreed to do. But it rejected a second recommendation that it
overhaul the office overseeing the radios to give it more authority.

“DHS
believes that it has already established a structure with the necessary
authority to ensure” that its various agencies can communicate, Crumpacker wrote in his response letter.