Close Close Comment Creative Commons Donate Email Add Email Facebook Instagram Facebook Messenger Mobile Nav Menu Podcast Print RSS Search Secure Twitter WhatsApp YouTube
Fall Member Drive Hold the powerful to account.
Donate Now

What Happens to New Jersey Officers Charged With Official Misconduct? We Gathered the Cases to Find Out.

How we used court records, charging documents and news clips to show how often criminal cops avoided jail time with reduced sentences.

Thomas P. Costello/Asbury Park Press

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as they’re published.

This story was co-published with the Asbury Park Press, a member of the ProPublica Local Reporting Network.

As police accountability draws increased public attention around the country, we asked the question: What happens to police officers whose misconduct leads to criminal charges?

New Jersey law calls for a mandatory minimum jail sentence when officers are convicted of official misconduct, the criminal charge for public corruption. Guidelines written by the state attorney general’s office go further, saying public officials shouldn’t get light plea deals in these cases.

Our story examines how often such cases resulted in jail time.

In April, we sought data from the New Jersey courts on everyone charged with official misconduct, both police officers and nonofficers, and the outcome of those cases. A court official told us they couldn’t export a complete database on defendants due to the limitations of their antiquated COBOL-based system and the complications of the COVID-19 pandemic. COBOL dates back to 1959, according to the National Museum of American History.

Court officials offered to update some existing reports, but they told us it would cost more than $36,000 for a comprehensive dataset dating back about a decade. Even then, the data might not contain entries for defendants who had their records expunged, which would happen for those who successfully complete pretrial intervention, a program for first-time offenders.

Instead of paying for the incomplete report, we reached out to the 21 county prosecutor’s offices, which filed the charges. They denied requests for data on crimes related to public office as overly broad.

We narrowed the request to documents charging people with official misconduct between 2013 and 2017. Nineteen of the 21 counties complied. The prosecutors office for Essex County, one of the state’s largest, refused. The Sussex County Prosecutor’s Office cited the COVID-19 pandemic as a hardship and never responded. The counties that responded with records account for 89% of the state’s population.

We also examined thousands of New Jersey news stories from a public records service called Nexis containing the keywords “official misconduct.” And we analyzed millions of rows of court data maintained by the Asbury Park Press that represent snapshots of New Jersey charging data in 2007, 2010 and 2019, as well as a snapshot of sentences in 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2019.

Between those sources, we identified 398 people accused of official misconduct from 2013 through 2017. Of those, at least 118 were law enforcement officers, which we defined as police officers, sheriff’s officers and corrections officers.

The records are not complete. Prosecutors and the courts were unable to provide records of the outcomes of 70 people who were accused of official misconduct, according to our documents, none of them known to be police officers. Moreover, we were unable to identify the occupation of 19 people we documented who were accused of official misconduct.

The gaps in the data aren’t large enough to impact the findings of the investigation.

We found officers were charged more often than non-officers. Even if none of the 19 people for whom we couldn’t find occupations were cops, officers would still be overrepresented in the charges compared with their makeup of the public workforce.

We also found that officers were jailed less often than non-officers. Even if all 70 defendants with unknown outcomes were non-officers and did not go to jail, officers would still have avoided jail sentences more often than non-officers.

ProPublica and the Asbury Park Press are investigating police misconduct in New Jersey. Is there something we should know about? Please complete our form to let us know.

Filed under:

Protect Independent Journalism

This story you’ve just finished was funded by our readers. We hope it inspires you to make a gift to ProPublica so that we can publish more investigations like this one that hold people in power to account and produce real change.

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that produces nonpartisan, evidence-based journalism to expose injustice, corruption and wrongdoing. We were founded over 10 years ago to fill a growing hole in journalism: Newsrooms were (and still are) shrinking, and legacy funding models are failing. Deep-dive reporting like ours is slow and expensive, and investigative journalism is a luxury in many newsrooms today — but it remains as critical as ever to democracy and our civic life. More than a decade (and six Pulitzer Prizes) later, ProPublica has built one of the largest investigative newsrooms in the country. Our work has spurred reform through legislation, at the voting booth and inside our nation’s most important institutions.

Your donation today will help us ensure that we can continue this critical work. From the climate crisis, to racial justice, to wealth inequality and much more, we are busier than ever covering stories you won’t see anywhere else. Make your gift of any amount today and join the tens of thousands of ProPublicans across the country, standing up for the power of independent journalism to produce real, lasting change. Thank you.

Donate Now

Latest Stories from ProPublica

Current site Current page