An amended lawsuit by fired bank examiner Carmen Segarra
describes a chaotic work environment at her old employer, the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York, alleging that lines of authority were unclear and bad
behavior by a supervised bank went unexamined.

A spokeswoman for the New York Fed said the bank was
reviewing the new
allegations
from Segarra, who was dismissed seven
months after being hired in late 2011 as part of a push to beef up supervision
of so-called Too-Big-to-Fail financial institutions.

Segarra claims she was terminated for refusing to change her
finding that Goldman Sachs did not have appropriate policies for handling
conflicts of interest in its business dealings. Her complaint alleges that the
senior supervising officer for the Fed at Goldman, Michael Silva, and his
deputy, Michael Koh, obstructed her examination of Goldman on several occasions.

Silva, who had worked at the New York Fed since 1992, left
last month to take a job as the chief regulatory officer and compliance leader
of GE Capital. That firm is one of the Too-Big-to-Fail financial institutions
regulated by the New York Fed. Silva did not respond to a request for comment.

A Fed official said Silva’s departure had nothing to do with
Segarra’s lawsuit, which was filed
in October
.

The New York Fed, which has jurisdiction over many of these
complex firms, recruited experts like Segarra to act as “risk specialists” to
review different aspects of bank operations. Segarra, an Ivy League-trained
lawyer with work experience at some of the nation’s top banks, was tasked with
examining the legal and compliance policies at Goldman.

Segarra’s lawsuit alleges that she
was never given a complete job description and describes tensions that existed
between Segarra and Fed staff embedded at Goldman who had previously performed
aspects of her job. Some of the embedded staff, including Silva, did not agree with Segarra’s interpretations of Goldman’s activities regarding conflicts, according to the complaint.

In legal papers, the Federal Reserve has said Segarra was an at-will employee
who was legally terminated. Goldman, which is not a defendant in Segarra’s lawsuit, has told ProPublica that it has the
required conflict-of-interest policy.

Both Silva and Koh are named as
defendants in the lawsuit along with the NY Fed. According to her complaint,
their job was to “manage the relationship” between Goldman and the Fed, not to
perform examinations.

While at the New York Fed, Segarra had a direct supervisor,
Jonathon Kim, who oversaw legal and compliance specialist examiners stationed
at several banks. According to the amended complaint, Kim, also a defendant,
told Segarra that the Fed “had failed to clearly articulate the different roles
of [the relationship managers] and bank examiners.”

When Segarra complained about the obstruction, the complaint
says, Kim told her she needed to learn “the critical skills of ‘absorbing and
diffusing.’”

“They allowed this lack of clarity to interfere with
Carmen’s bank examining activity,” said Segarra’s
attorney, Linda Steagle. “In fact we are saying that
this amorphous structure exists, in large part, so they can do exactly that.”

The New York Fed’s website broadly
describes how the supervisory structure is supposed to work. Oversight of
large, complex institutions is “led by a senior supervisory officer”
who leads “the development and execution of the supervisory program for
the firm” and “is responsible for interactions with the board of
directors and senior management.”

Additionally, team specialists “interact directly with
members of the firm’s management across various business lines and control
functions, including the control functions responsible for managing credit
risk, market risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, and legal and compliance
risk.”

In an addition to the amended complaint, the parties this
week filed a joint letter detailing a trial schedule that is expected to
stretch into next year. The letter discloses that Segarra possesses “audio
recordings of several meeting with defendants” and suggests that they
might assist the Court if there are disputes over facts in the case.

The New York Fed is one of 12 regional reserve banks that form the Federal Reserve System. It is the
largest such bank in terms of assets and volume of activity, according to its website.
While the New York Fed is a private bank, the Federal Reserve’s Board of
Governors in Washington, D.C., delegates a public regulatory function to
it.