ProPublica

Journalism in the Public Interest

Cancel

Pentagon Spokesman Wrong on Purple Heart

.

(Brendan Smialowski/Getty Images)

On Thursday, we published a story that said the Army isn't awarding Purple Hearts to some soldiers who suffered mild traumatic brain injuries in Iraq.

We found e-mails showing that some top medical commanders don't think the injury is serious enough to merit the honor, even though Army regulations [PDF] make it clear that soldiers with such head trauma are eligible for the award. Top brass acknowledged that commanders had mistakenly denied the honor to soldiers in the past, but said things were getting better. "We are moving in the right direction to fix this," Gen. Peter Chiarelli, the Army's second-in-command told us.

They've still got a ways to go, if a slip-up by the Pentagon's top spokesman is anything to go by.

After our story ran, Geoff Morrell, spokesman for Defense Secretary Robert Gates, was asked a question about the Purple Heart at the daily Pentagon press briefing. He told an ABC News reporter that the Purple Heart "has not been" authorized for mild traumatic brain injuries. Also known as concussions, such head wounds typically leave no visible signs of damage, though they can result in long-term cognitive impairment.

"I don't think that people think this is an appropriate medal for those types of injuries," he said.

That's not what Army regulations say, however. As far back as the 1950s, the regulations have contained an official list of wounds that "clearly justify" the Purple Heart, the nation's oldest military honor. One of them: "Concussion injuries caused as a result of enemy generated explosions."

The Pentagon has corrected Morrell's mistake. The official transcript contained this addition: "Correction: Each service ensures members who sustain a concussion/mild TBI are awarded the Purple Heart if the two basic Purple Heart criteria are met: wound was the result of enemy action or occurred in action with the enemy, and the wound required treatment by a medical officer."

So that settles it. Now we'll see how the Army responds to the soldiers we interviewed, who have battled unsuccessfully to receive the Purple Heart despite well-documented wounds. Morrell didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.

Thank god there are some actual journalists that are able to uncover important stories like this for the public to see. Unfortunately, it isn’t as entertaining as reporting on the ground zero mosque, so the commercial media won’t pick it up.

But please, keep up the work! It’s this type of reporting that makes the media necessary in society.

Richard L. Lindberg

Sept. 11, 2010, Noon

I believe it is time for the President to haul SecDef, SecArmy, the Army Chief of Staff and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs into his office and read them the riot act about this.

Many men and woman in the military have not recievied this and other awards because of sloppy paper work. And there are other reasons. One US Marine waited over twenty years fo the Medal of Honor. He was avacuted from the “Canal”  before he could be investigated.  His paper work never completed. He had to work though DAV and others to prove it. This was reported in DAV magazine, some two years ago. They should hand out medals for getting serious red tape.  And to those who help GI’s get there due.
I served in Vietnam era 64-65.
Thank all for their Service. And may God bless all who have served.

Dennis J Katz AA
USN\USS Bon Homme Richard (CVA31)
3 Dec 63 to 17 Nov 67
National Serivice Medal
Armed Forces Exp. Medal
Vietnam Service Medal w 1961- (device)

Siva L. Williams

Sept. 13, 2010, 7:23 a.m.

I believe that you report was slanted and inaccurate.  Medical Commanders in theater only approve medals for soldiers assigned to their units.  It is rare that a soldier assigned to a medical unit would be allowed outside of the wire without the theater medical commander’s approval.  The purpose of the memo that was in this report was to call attention to the fact that soldiers need documentation that they were treated for a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).  BG Caravalho was attempting to let his subordinate doctors know that they needed to document any and all mTBI complaints that there patients had.  Doctors cannot approve the recommendation for the Purple Heart.  Doctors can only review the medical records and say yea or nay to the presence of supporting documentation.  I feel that you all did a masterful job of throwing the General under the bus by reporting the contents of the memo out of context.

Siva Williams
SFC, USA

i suppose is about a frustration of this people to feel like slaves,is about cia influence

If the Purple Hearts are/were awarded in accordance with the specifications for the medal met, then the military would have to admit to the HUGE number of TBI injuries incurred by U.S. troops rather than obfuscating those numbers.  The ruse begins with the doctors not reporting TBI injuries or failing to include in in their ‘documentation.’  There are several investigative articles about such actions and about how the military has downplayed the serious and life-altering affects of TBI’s so they can keep down all the attendant medical costs for treating TBI victims.  As long as Gates (remember U S ops in Central America and Olly North and Poindexter…his pals?) is Secy of Defense, obfuscation, subterfuge, and suppression of evidence will the SOP.

SFC Williams:

I’m sorry you feel that we did not represent BG Caravalho’s memo accurately. However, it says what it says. It says that most soldiers with only “minimum” medical treatment don’t deserve the Purple Heart. But since its inception as recognition of injury, the award of the Purple Heart has not depended on the *degree* of injury. You have to be injured in combat, and received treatment. It doesn’t matter if you get one stitch or 20 stitches, of you receive one week of treatment or a lifetime. The Purple Heart says you were wounded, not how badly.

This article is part of an ongoing investigation:
Brain Wars

Brain Wars: How the Military Is Failing Its Wounded

The military has failed to diagnose brain injuries in thousands of soldiers returning from overseas.

The Story So Far

Traumatic brain injury is considered the “signature wound” of soldiers fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Official military statistics show that more than 115,000 soldiers have suffered mild traumatic brain injuries since the wars began. Shock waves from roadside bombs can ripple through soldiers’ brains, causing damage that sometimes leaves no visible scars but may cause lasting mental and physical harm.

More »

Get Updates

Stay on top of what we’re working on by subscribing to our email digest.

optional