Who We Are

ProPublica is an independent, non-profit newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. We strive to foster change through exposing exploitation of the weak by the strong and the failures of those with power to vindicate the trust placed in them.

More...

Video of Palin and Stevens: The ‘Big Difference Between Reality and Perception’

by Paul Kiel, ProPublica - September 3, 2008 5:02 pm EST
Tags: Alaska, Sarah Palin, Ted Stevens

Sen. Ted Stevens and Sarah Palin (Credit: Clark James Mishler/Getty Images)As reporters continue to raise questions about Gov. Sarah Palin's "reform" mantle, the McCain campaign continues to tout her reformer credentials.

Here's another area where the reality is more complicated than the official storyline. The supposed bad blood between Palin and Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK), the state's most eminent Republican, is part of her appeal. As David Brooks wrote in the New York Times, Palin "risked her career taking on the corrupt Republican establishment in her own state" and "made mortal enemies of the two people McCain has always held up as the carriers of the pork-barrel disease: [Rep. Don Young] and Stevens."

But it turns out Palin's campaign touted Stevens' endorsement in her 2006 run for governor. (The ad was quickly taken down from the Web site after Palin was named as the pick.) And the two appeared almost chummy sitting together in a press conference two months ago.

The Anchorage Daily News has some video of the joint appearance. (Stevens was indicted later that month.)

Palin joined Stevens in rolling out his energy plan for Alaska, but the paper's reporters repeatedly questioned the two about their relationship.

Didn't Stevens mind that Palin had publicly called on Stevens to explain himself after FBI agents raided his Alaska home last September? No, Stevens said, he hadn't taken "umbrage."

What about her criticism of some of his earmarks? Stevens didn't "really object" to that, he said; the state has required earmarks in its "period of need," but greater oil revenue should put an end to that.

As for Palin, she sidestepped questions about whether she would endorse Stevens, but made clear there was no bad blood between them:

"I have great respect for the senator and he needs to be heard across America -- his voice, his experience, his passion, needs to be heard across America so that Alaska can contribute more, so that we can be producers, so that we can help lead the rest of the U.S. I have great respect for him. There's a big difference between reality and perception regarding our relationship."

Interested in what Paul Kiel is reading today? Read the articles around the Web he’s sharing.

Need to know more? Get ProPublica headlines delivered by e-mail every day.

Related Articles by Tag

No More ‘Missing Voters’ in Alaska
by Kristin Jones - November 19, 2008 11:07 am

Stevens Might Lose Election After All
by Kristin Jones - November 13, 2008 12:44 pm

The Mystery of the Missing Alaskan Voters
by Kristin Jones - November 11, 2008 11:35 am

GOP Senate Leader Hedges on Expulsion for Stevens
by Jesse Nankin - November 5, 2008 5:53 pm

Legal Questions Surround Stevens’ Future in Senate
by Jesse Nankin - November 5, 2008 2:44 pm

Related Articles by Category

Rahmbo’s Revolving Door Revisited
by Ben Protess - November 19, 2008 1:27 pm

Can Obama Reverse Bush’s Midnight Rules?
by Joaquin Sapien - November 19, 2008 11:20 am

No More ‘Missing Voters’ in Alaska
by Kristin Jones - November 19, 2008 11:07 am

Vendettas and Shady Ethics: Meet the Candidates to Replace Obama
by Ben Protess - November 18, 2008 4:26 pm

Change.gov ‘Agenda’ Pages Are Back
by Jennifer LaFleur - November 18, 2008 11:21 am


© Copyright 2008 Pro Publica Inc. The original content on this site is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.