In One Gulf County, Officials Take Home Government Salaries, Plus Pay from BP
Cleanup efforts continue in the Gulf of Mexico on July 14, 2010. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)
Gulf County, Fla. — population 15,000 — has been clear of BP’s oil so far, but it has tried to get ready. The small coastal county, according to one county commissioner, has spent hundreds of thousands to protect itself, aware that the crude hitting its neighboring counties could creep closer.
But these days, when the Gulf County Board of Commissioners votes on anything BP-related, only two members of the five-person board can participate. The other three must abstain. Two of them, on top of their duties to the county, also work for BP contractors. One has a son who is helping in the cleanup.
I chanced upon this nugget of news last week when I reported about the challenges posed by the BP reimbursement process for some local governments along the Gulf Coast. When I called the board chairman, Carmen McLemore, to ask about his county’s experience with the reimbursement process, he refused to answer.
“I’m actually working with BP and they won’t allow me to talk to reporters,” he told me.
“BP told you you can’t talk to reporters?” I asked.
“No news media. Bye!” And McLemore hung up.
When I called up his fellow commissioner Billy Traylor, who also works for a BP contractor, Traylor didn’t have the same problems talking to me. So I asked whether he feels he has a conflict of interest, given that he’s getting paid both by the county and, ultimately, by BP.
“There’s been several issues come up about BP—BP this and BP that,” Traylor said, regarding some of the county commissioners’ votes. “I’ve had to abstain from some of those issues because as a subcontractor, I cannot vote."
Some people might see it as a conflict, but he doesn’t see one. “As a matter of fact,” he told me, “it is a blessing that I’m working out here. I actually know what’s going on. If I had been a commissioner sitting on the outside—and I mean no disrespect to my fellow commissioners—I would not have a clue as to what was happening as far as beach operations, as far as what’s happening on site with local hiring."
Traylor told me he initially got paid $11.25 an hour to lay boom on the beaches, and after he was promoted to crew foreman, his pay was bumped up to $19 an hour. The county commissioners are paid around $26,000 a year for the part-time office, and most hold other jobs. Traylor, who was not already employed, said he was one of the first in the county to get hired for cleanup work, but he assured me that the contracting jobs were plentiful.
“If you want a job in Gulf County and you don’t have a job, it’s your fault because the opportunity has been given out to everyone,” he said. “We comb beaches and put boom out. It’s not a glamorous job. It’s hot, sweaty work.”
I asked Traylor what the county’s experience was with getting reimbursed from BP.
“I know of no reimbursements that have been held up,” he told me. “I was just talking to our people and our staff, and there’s nothing out there that’s outstanding.”
But when I called the other two commissioners—that is, the two who can vote on BP-related matters—I heard a vastly different story.
“We’re rapidly approaching $300,000 to $400,000, and we’ve been compensated only $45,000,” Commissioner Bill Williams told me. “I’m not only frustrated. If we were to continue at the same rate right now, we will literally be out of money and have to shut our [emergency operation center] down. The anxiety and stress level is unbelievable.”
Both his facts—the $45,000 check, the outstanding claims—and his frustrations were echoed by Commissioner Warren Yeager.
“It’s tough on a small county like what we have here,” Yeager told me. “It has been very difficult and frustrating that you can’t get to the right people who can give you answers.”
Along the Gulf Coast, these concerns aren’t uncommon. And neither are the anecdotes about the instances when BP and the government become hard to distinguish.
Mac McClelland of Mother Jones noted last month that in Louisiana, off-duty police officers are allowed to work for BP while in uniform, and some have. A ProPublica photographer, as you may have heard, was stopped by police near BP’s Texas City refinery and—for reasons no one has explained—his information was turned over to BP.
Energized by the fact that another commissioner who was also a BP subcontractor had spoken with me, I prepared to call Commissioner McLemore again, just to ask about why he can’t chat, given that BP’s Media Access Policy says anyone and everyone can talk freely to reporters. He didn’t sound happy to hear from me again.
“I’m a politician. I’m chairman of the Board of County Commissioners,” he said. “I don’t need no problems or want no problems. I just want to work and go home.”
I asked him about what kind of work he does for the BP contractor. He started to answer, then stopped.
“I gotta go, they're hollering at me,” McLemore said. He quickly hung up.
When I called McLemore back this morning to verify the BP contractor he works for, he confirmed that he worked for Eagle-SWS. When I asked him if it was SWS or BP that told him he couldn't speak with reporters, without another word, he hung up on me again. I've called and spoken with Eagle-SWS to ask about its media policy for employees, but the company has yet to get back to me with a response.
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- How Citibank Dumped Lousy Mortgages on the Government
- Obama Housing Plans vs. Reality
- How (and How Not) to Jumpstart an Economy
- Federal Rules to Disclose Fracking Chemicals Could Come with Exceptions
- The Best, Most Revealing Reporting on the Foreclosure Crisis
- Colorado Redistricting Had Inside Help
- Pioneering a Way to Distinguish Blood Disorders From Child Abuse
- New Arrests in Murdoch Bribery Scandal Raise Question of U.S. Charges
- SEC Warns Top Banker of Charges Over Magnetar Deal
- Two Wall Street Players Ensnared in New Probe
- Will Mortgage Settlement Avoid Repeating Obama’s Foreclosure Failures?
- Obama Housing Plans vs. Reality
- How Citibank Dumped Lousy Mortgages on the Government
- Why Millions Won't Get Help From Big Mortgage Settlement
- How (and How Not) to Jumpstart an Economy
- Federal Rules to Disclose Fracking Chemicals Could Come with Exceptions
- The Best, Most Revealing Reporting on the Foreclosure Crisis
- Colorado Redistricting Had Inside Help
- California Congresswoman’s Redistricting Shenanigans Catch Eye of Ethics Committee
- New Arrests in Murdoch Bribery Scandal Raise Question of U.S. Charges







5 comments
Michael Evans
July 19, 2010, 1:54 p.m.
Busted! “I’m actually working with BP and they won’t allow me to talk to reporters,”
How many times has BP denied that it prohibits its employees from talking to the media?
pgillenw
July 19, 2010, 3:31 p.m.
Disgusting!
This reporting is excellent.
Your story is yet another indication that BP is not through with its deception. Guarantee that, for now, since it has been reported by BP that the well has been capped (although we really don’t know for sure) BP is pulling back on its responsibilities. First, control the air space, control its workers and keep their devious actions from the press.
As I have said before our Gov’t needs to seize the assets of all corporations involved with this disaster, especially BP’s.
Maconga
July 19, 2010, 6:08 p.m.
Florida may be the sunshine state, but the sunshine rarely penetrates the convoluted layers of politics and personal relationships that are the norm in small town, small county government. It’s not unique to Florida, it’s pretty much the same all over the south and in rural areas almost everywhere.
dobropet
July 20, 2010, 2:50 p.m.
I disagree pgillenw,
To seize the assets of this company will only exacerbate the situation further. That many people out of work, as the economy is now, would surely amount to widespread unemployment(higher than what it is now, given that the governments statistical measures are somewhat askewed).
Besides, this administration got their funds from BP for the disaster, why didn’t this administration seek to have those funds readily available for the people of the gulf instead?
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/59904.html
And, hasn’t this administration already sought to aid in the distribution of those funds by appointing another czar?
http://abcnews.go.com/WN/bp-oil-spill-containment-cap-reaches-leak-anger/story?id=11145052
This is a classic example of how government intervention into the private affairs of corporations is killing the U.S. economy.
http://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Obama-Administration-Knew-About-Deepwater-Horizon-35000-Feet-Well-Bore.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,594783,00.html
Helen A. Spalding
July 20, 2010, 7:09 p.m.
Secrecy is the best weapon a deciever has. Next is the ability to subvert officials. What better way to do this than to hire them, or have sub-contractors hire them! Then the deciever controls not only the vote and actions of the officials, but also can deny them the right to speak to anyone who might be inclined to reveal inconvenient truths! Meanwhile, the deciever can do their sanctimonious denial. Works for corporations, politicians, preachers, etc.