ProPublica

Journalism in the Public Interest

Cancel

Inspectors Flagged Leaky Alaska Pipeline for Replacement Two Years Prior

Concerned about the potential for corrosion, inspectors for the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System flagged a segment for replacement in a 2008 risk assessment, according to Reuters and The Hill. As we've noted, a leak was detected along that segment earlier this month, necessitating emergency shutdowns of the pipeline.

The disclosure of the earlier risk assessment was made by the pipeline operator, Alyeska Pipeline Service, in response to a request from Rep. Edward Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat, for more information about the pipeline’s prior inspections.

The attempt to inspect this particular section of the pipeline for corrosion was last made in 2008, but was halted because the line was underground and encased in cement [PDF]. Removing the cement for an inspection would risk damaging the pipeline, the company said, so instead it was flagged for replacement. Here’s Reuters, quoting the company’s CEO:

"A risk assessment completed in October 2008 recommended not removing the concrete, but rather, replacing the pipeline."

Alyeska said it had planned to replace the stretch of pipe in question as early as this year. In 2009, Alyeska began the design and engineering work needed before replacing the stretch, said spokeswoman Michelle Egan. "There has been progress made. The work that was required has begun," she said.

In 2007, Alyeska appeared before the House Energy and Commerce committee and testified that accelerated corrosion was not a threat to the integrity of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System. It also touted “new corrosion monitoring locations at Pump Station One,” the area where the latest leak was found, according to Rep. Markey’s letter to the company.

The leak was not detected by the company’s leak detection system, but by someone walking by on operator rounds, according to the company. Pipeline operations were resumed on Friday, according to a joint command center that has been responding to the incident.

Alyeska also disclosed in its response that the pipeline has had at least 20 spills since 2001—adding up to about 400,000 gallons of spilled oil, the Hill reported.

That count doesn’t include other spills in Alaska from pipelines operated separately by BP. As we’ve noted, Alyeska has strong ties to BP, its largest single shareholder, and though it is technically a separate company, almost all of Alyeska's CEOs have been executives on loan from BP. (The current CEO is one of only two exceptions.) BP’s own maintenance reports have also shown problems with severe corrosion throughout its pipeline system.

These risk assessments that are performed lack a catalyst to prompt companies to take corrective measures.  Pipelines are “flagged” and “recommendations” are made but they have no bite to them.  The reports seem to be viewed as observatory remarks as opposed to a call to action.  Would it not make more sense to “recommend” pipe replacement with a given deadline and a substantive penalty should that timeline not be met?  Asking a child to keep their hand out of the cookie jar, with no consequences, usually yields fewer cookies at the end of the day.

When E H Flour designed the pipeline & flipped the ‘ON’ switch in 78, it was to have a lifespan of 25 years.
We are now approaching 35 years now- every original piece of pipe on that run is paper-thin, or near it, & must be replaced- so said the man, w/o political ambitions, that designed it!
E H’s early fame was the ‘Fluorescent Light-bulb’.
E H. Flour Corporation- ‘An American Bear’ A Paramount Motion Pictures Production- in the works.

Add a comment

Email me when someone responds to this article.

Get Updates

Stay on top of what we’re working on by subscribing to our email digest.

optional

Our Hottest Stories

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •