Who We Are

ProPublica is an independent, non-profit newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. We strive to foster change through exposing exploitation of the weak by the strong and the failures of those with power to vindicate the trust placed in them.

More...

Formaldehyde found in more FEMA trailers

by Joaquin Sapien, ProPublica - October 23, 2008 5:08 pm EST

A FEMA trailer in Coden, Ala.In case you missed it, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has again come under fire for providing formaldehyde-contaminated trailers to disaster victims. This time the controversy centers on 558 trailers distributed to victims of the floods that ravaged Iowa in June. A local television station tested 20 of the trailers and found that several had formaldehyde levels higher than what the Environmental Protection Agency says is safe.

The day after KGAN-2, the CBS affiliate in Cedar Rapids, ran its story, FEMA held a conference call with reporters and outlined the precautions the agency had taken to ensure the trailers were safe before they were delivered. FEMA officials said they had tested the trailers and found that the levels were lower than what the state of Iowa says is safe. FEMA also noted that formaldehyde levels can rise when occupants cook, bring home dry-cleaning, or smoke in their trailers. Three years ago FEMA officials made similar comments after Hurricane Katrina victims complained that formaldehyde fumes in their FEMA-issued trailers were making them sick.

KGAN-2 produced another story questioning FEMA’s argument.

Earlier this week the Associated Press reported that the TV station had found that levels in the trailers “ranged from 0.023 parts per million to 0.111 parts per million. The FEMA threshold is 0.016 parts per million, and the state accepts 0.04 parts per million.” In other words the TV station found formaldehyde levels several times higher than the standard used by FEMA.

Although those levels are lower than the formaldehyde levels found in many of the trailers given to Katrina victims, reports of formaldehyde-related symptoms are still pouring in to the Cedar Rapids television station.

Back in April, FEMA administrator R. David Paulison told Congress that the agency would never again use trailers in response to a disaster. But two months later the agency admitted that if another Katrina or Rita-sized hurricane struck this season, the agency might have to resort to the trailers again, which it did in Iowa.

Earlier this month ProPublica published a story in conjunction with the Atlanta Journal-Constitution about how FEMA misused a flawed Centers for Disease Control report to assure the public that the trailers provided to Katrina victims were safe.

This story can be found on the web at the following address:
http://www.propublica.org/article/formaldehyde-found-in-more-fema-trailers-1023/

Need to know more? Get ProPublica headlines delivered by e-mail every day.

Links

Related Articles by Tag

Where Things Stand: Formaldehyde Problems Remain Unresolved
by Joaquin Sapien - December 23, 2008 1:24 pm

Formaldehyde Found in Houses Provided for Katrina Victims in Mississippi
by Joaquin Sapien - December 19, 2008 12:55 pm

FEMA Trailer Children Sickened
by Joaquin Sapien - November 26, 2008 11:14 am

Government Study on Children Living in Katrina Trailers Muddled By Delays, Confusion
by Joaquin Sapien - November 1, 2008 12:17 pm

Why CDC Responded With ‘Lack of Urgency’ to Formaldehyde Warnings
by Joaquin Sapien - October 4, 2008 11:01 pm

Related Articles by Category

Dems Prepare Bills to Combat Midnight Regulations
by Joaquin Sapien - January 7, 2009 3:38 pm

Bush Signing Statements Will Retire With Their Author
by Christopher Weaver - January 7, 2009 1:46 pm

Reid Disavows Report on Burris Deal
by Ben Protess - January 7, 2009 11:05 am

Burris Rebuffed by Senate (For Now)
by Ben Protess - January 6, 2009 12:42 pm

Agencies Move to Restrict FOIA Access in Last-Minute Regs
by Jennifer LaFleur - January 5, 2009 2:07 pm


© Copyright 2009 Pro Publica Inc.

REPRINTS

You can republish our articles for free, if you credit us, link to us, and don't edit our material or sell it separately. (We're licensed under Creative Commons, which provides the legal details.)