ProPublica

Journalism in the Public Interest

Cancel
Topic
Project
Providers: Tell Us What You Know About Patient Safety
Overview
by Marshall Allen and Olga Pierce
ProPublica, Sep. 18, 2012, 3:57 pm

(BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/ Getty Images)

Are you an administrator, doctor, nurse or some other type of health care worker who could contribute to our patient safety stories? We know that your first-hand knowledge could be a valuable resource as we continue to report on patient safety. Please complete the following questionnaire, and pass it along to others you know who care about these issues. We may be getting in touch to ask you to point us in the right direction. We'll keep your information confidential. 

Get Involved
blog comments powered by Disqus

Projects You Can Help With

.

Help Us Report On The American Red Cross

Share A Tip

.

Have You Ever Been Sued Over a Debt? Help ProPublica Investigate Collection Practices

Share Your Story

.

Help Us Investigate Internships for Academic Credit

Find Out How

103 submissions

.

Join Our Reporting Network for Updates on Ways to ‘Get Involved’

Sign Up

6459 signed up

More on This Investigation

We’re Still Not Tracking Patient Harm

Top patient-safety experts call on Congress to step in and, among other steps, give the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention wider responsibility for measuring medical mistakes.

Beyond Ratings: More Tools Coming to Pick Your Doctor

For years, patients have had few ways to compare doctors beyond their reputations. With a huge Medicare data release this week, that may soon change.

Rocky Mountain High or Reefer Madness? Legal Pot in Colorado Comes with Risks

A reporter returns to his hometown and confronts the new reality of legalized marijuana.

So You’ve Become a Patient Safety Statistic – Now What?

Six recommended steps to take if you've suffered harm in a medical facility.

Ad Endorsing da Vinci Robot Violated U of Illinois Policies, Review Finds

When surgical team members endorsed the robot in an ad, controversy ensued. An internal review finds no ill intent, but says policies were violated, calls for clearer rules.