Prominent oceanographers are accusing the Obama administration of allowing BP to obscure the true scope of the Gulf oil disaster, reports The New York Times. The scientists say federal agencies--most notably, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration--has been slow to obtain and release data on the enormous plumes of dispersed oil forming in the deep waters of the Gulf, which both the Houston Chronicle and Huffington Post have also pointed out.
The Gulf oil spill has put the Minerals Management Service, the U.S. offshore drilling regulator, under intense scrutiny, but the Associated Press reports it's not alone: Across the globe, offshore oil drilling regulation has shifted away from heavy government involvement to self-regulation by industry.
The Huffington Post Investigative Fund reports on a legal process that caused one Baltimore woman to lose her home. Vicki Valentine had paid off her mortgage, but owed $362 to the city for her water bill. The city sold that debt to investors--which typically range from big banks to regional banks to law firms--and with interest, processing fees for the sale, and legal charges stacked up, Valentine couldn't pay and lost her home.
A House probe has found that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the nation's public health agency, misled D.C. residents in 2004, when it played down the health risks of lead in the water, reports The Washington Post. The CDC declined to directly comment to the Post on the investigators' findings, although it acknowledged that one of its claims--that "no children had been found with lead poisoning"--was misleading.
These stories are part of our ongoing roundup of investigations from other news outlets. For more, visit our Investigations Elsewhere page.
Thank you for your interest in republishing this story. You are are free republish the article and graphics so long as you do the following:
You have to credit us — ideally in the byline. We prefer “Author Name, ProPublica.” If your CMS does not allow you to do this, please include a line at the top of the story that reads: “This story was originally published by ProPublica.”
If you’re republishing online, you must link to our website, include all of the links from our story, and use our PixelPing tag.
You can’t edit our material, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”)
You cannot republish our photographs or illustrations without specific permission (contact us at [email protected] for more information).
It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads, but not ads specifically sold against our stories. You can’t state or imply that donations to your organization support ProPublica’s work.
You can’t sell our material separately or syndicate it.
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. (To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, contact our Director of Business Development, Celeste LeCompte.)
You can’t use our work to populate a web site designed to improve rankings on search engines, or solely to gain revenue from network-based advertisements.
We do not generally permit translation of our stories into another language.
Any web site our stories appear on must include a prominent and effective way to contact you.
If you share republished stories on social media, we’d appreciate being tagged in your posts. We have official accounts for ProPublica and ProPublica Illinois on both Twitter (@ProPublica and @ProPublicaIL) and Facebook.
Copy and paste the following into your page to republish: