[Update: 1/28: The House passed the stimulus package early this evening by a vote of 244-to-188.]
Congressmen, start your amending!
Now that the economic stimulus bill is on the House floor, it's time for members of Congress to try to change it.
Already, they've removed a provision (PDF) extending Medicaid to family planning, added $15 million for historically black colleges and cut $200 million for Washington's National Mall. This afternoon, the House will consider 11 amendments.
But what about the nearly 200 that got left on the cutting room floor?
The scrapped amendments spanned the political spectrum -- everything from opening the Arctic Wildlife Refuge for oil and gas exploration to expanding college loans to students convicted of drug crimes.
Rep. Mike Rogers (R-AL) proposed a $7,500 tax credit (PDF) to encourage Americans to buy new cars.
Rep. Paul Hodes (D-NH) suggested extending the deadline for highway funds in case projects get stalled by cold weather and ice (PDF).
Rep. Vic Snyder (D-AR) offered allowing funds for zoos, aquariums and swimming pools (PDF).
And several Pacific state lawmakers asked for $200 million to compensate Filipino World War II veterans (PDF).
There were also some innovative ideas.
What about repealing (PDF) the final $350 billion of TARP funds? (Tiahrt (R-KS).) Or $10 billion to buy up Lehman Brothers bonds (PDF) from state governments? (Speier (D-CA).) Or naming any new bridge or highway in the bill after a soldier (PDF) who was killed in combat? (McCotter (D-MI).)
And why not give the jobs that would be created for renovating public housing projects under the bill to people who live in public housing projects (PDF)? (Waters (D-CA).)
Several Republicans are aggravated that their amendments that were approved in last week's 12-hour Energy and Commerce Committee hearing were dropped from the bill when it was formally introduced.
Those included prohibiting millionaires from collecting COBRA payments, requiring technology for computerized medical records to be made in the U.S. and specifically stating in the bill that privacy provisions wouldn't prevent doctors from talking to their patients.
California Rep. David Dreier accused Speaker Nancy Pelosi of misleading the public with a news release stating that those amendments were included.
"We are throwing bipartisanship, openness and transparency out the window," said Dreier, the Republican leader on the Rules Committee, which decides which amendments make it to the House floor.
There were also some noble-sounding amendments that seemed designed to create a negative voting record for future Democratic political campaigns.
Rep. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) offered one amendment (PDF) that would have prevented Congress from pressuring state and local agencies on behalf of campaign contributors and another (PDF) that would have banned funding for duck ponds, skate parks and splash playgrounds.
But when those amendments were submitted for a Rules Committee vote, the proposal also included cutting $50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts, which has been a Republican target in the bill.
The amendments failed.
Of those that made it through for debate on the House floor are $3 billion more for public transit, expanded whistleblower protections and a requirement that the Department of Homeland Security buy uniforms made in the U.S.
There are also unlikely Republican amendments, including one that would strip the bill of everything but tax cuts.
After much GOP mocking -- which Appropriations Chairman David Obey described as behaving like 1,000 mosquitoes -- Democrats yielded on National Mall renovations.
Illinois Republican Mark Kirk said funds would have gone to replace the Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool with an ice skating rink.
"We would also be providing taxpayer funds for a 'contemplation area,' computer-driven toilets, water taxi stops and taxpayer funds for stall and kiosks," he said.