Close Close Comment Creative Commons Donate Email Add Email Facebook Instagram Facebook Messenger Mobile Nav Menu Podcast Print RSS Search Secure Twitter WhatsApp YouTube

Your Questions About the New York City Police Complaint Data, Answered

We’ve tackled a few of the most common questions from the public and journalists, including what data we received and what we did and didn’t publish.

New York City Police Department officers and vehicles in Manhattan on June 12. (Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images)

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as they’re published.

Since we published The NYPD Files, we’ve fielded a number of questions about the data from readers. We’ve answered a few of the most common ones here.

What data did you release?

We are releasing 33,358 allegations filed with New York’s Civilian Complaint Review Board against current NYPD officers, as long as those officers have had at least one complaint against them substantiated. These allegations have all been fully investigated by the CCRB.

This represents allegations against 3,996 officers employed as of June 2020. We do not have allegations against officers who are no longer employed by the NYPD.

What data did you receive from the NYC CCRB?

We received 36,892 total allegations.

Which records did you not release?

Of the data we received, we have excluded from our published app and the data download 3,213 individual allegations labeled as “unfounded” — under 9% of the total number of records.

We also removed a small number of officers (62) against whom the CCRB had substantiated allegations, but whose substantiated allegations had not gone fully through the NYPD’s administrative prosecution process.

Is the data you received different from the data that the New York Civil Liberties Union has? If so, how?

We requested fewer records than the NYCLU did, limiting our request only to officers who had at least one substantiated complaint.

I know that at least one complaint has been filed against an officer. Why can’t I find the officer (or the complaint) in the database?

If the officer is currently employed by the NYPD and is not in this dataset, then the CCRB had not substantiated at least one allegation against that person when we received the information. Some recent allegations may have been substantiated or investigated, but haven’t yet gone through the NYPD’s administrative prosecution process (which occurs after the CCRB’s process) and were not provided to us.

If the officer is in this data but you don’t see the complaint, it is most likely because the investigation had not been completed or fully closed by the time we received these records. That could be for a number of reasons, including the CCRB’s inability to contact the complainant. The data only includes complaints that have received full investigations and been closed. Therefore, it’s potentially missing instances with uncooperative or unreachable complainants.

The last reason you may not see a complaint is if the CCRB listed the complaint as “unfounded,” meaning that they determined that the allegation did not, in fact, occur. We removed these. We removed about 9% of records from this dataset with that categorization.

Why are there more complaints filed recently?

The data only includes closed cases for active-duty officers, so older cases against officers who have retired or left the force are not included. Also, newer cases that have not yet been fully closed or investigated — a process that can take months — are not included.

I don’t live in New York. How can I see information like this for my city?

We’re glad you asked! Andrew Ford, a reporter with the Asbury Park Press and a member of the ProPublica Local Reporting Network, wrote a handy guide on just this question! Read the full article here, or check out our swipeable explainer on Instagram. If you find interesting data, let us know.

Filed under:

Protect Independent Journalism

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that produces nonpartisan, evidence-based journalism to expose injustice, corruption and wrongdoing. We were founded ten years ago to fill a growing hole in journalism: newsrooms were (and still are) shrinking, and legacy funding models failing. Deep-dive reporting like ours is slow and expensive, and investigative journalism is a luxury in many newsrooms today — but it remains as critical as ever to democracy and our civic life. A decade (and five Pulitzer Prizes) later, ProPublica has built the largest investigative newsroom in the country. Our work has spurred reform through legislation, at the voting booth, and inside our nation’s most important institutions.

This story you’ve just finished was funded by our readers and we hope it inspires you to make a gift to ProPublica so that we can publish more investigations like this one that holds people in power to account and produces real change.

Your donation will help us ensure that we can continue this critical work. From the Trump Administration, criminal justice, health care, immigration and so much more, we are busier than ever covering stories you won’t see anywhere else. Make your gift of any amount today and join the tens of thousands of ProPublicans across the country, standing up for the power of independent journalism to produce real, lasting change. Thank you.

Donate Now

Portrait of Ken Schwencke

Ken Schwencke

Ken Schwencke is the editor of our news applications team, which creates interactive databases and graphics.

Portrait of Celeste LeCompte

Celeste LeCompte

Celeste LeCompte is the vice president of strategy and operations at ProPublica, focused on revenue, partnerships and other strategic initiatives.

Latest Stories from ProPublica

Current site Current page