Skip to main content Close Close Comment Creative Commons Donate Email Add Email Facebook Instagram Mastodon Facebook Messenger Mobile Nav Menu Podcast Print ProPublica RSS Search Secure Twitter WhatsApp YouTube
  • ProPublica
  • Local Initiatives
  • Data Store
  • Donate
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Like us on Facebook
  • Search
  • Newsletters

ProPublica logo

  • Graphics & Data
  • Newsletters
  • About
  • Racial Justice
  • Trump Administration
  • Health Care
  • Criminal Justice
  • More…
  • Series
  • Video
  • Impact
  • Search
  • More

A roundtable with four climate reporters on the challenges of the beat.

Welcome to Not Shutting Up, a newsletter from ProPublica’s leadership. You’re receiving this because you’ve supported ProPublica’s journalism; we’re grateful for that, and we hope to give you some context on how our newsroom works. If this email was forwarded to you, you can sign up to receive it here.


Hi there,

I’m Ruth Baron, ProPublica’s newsletter editor.

For the last few years, my colleague Lisa Song has been reporting on carbon emissions and offsets. It’s a topic that’s nearly as impenetrable as it is urgent, and in the pre-pandemic days, cornering Lisa in the office kitchen at ProPublica world headquarters in New York and asking her to explain her latest findings was one of my favorite activities.

At the end of April, Lisa and James Temple of MIT Technology Review published The Climate Solution Actually Adding Millions of Tons of CO2 Into the Atmosphere. It reveals how California policy generated up to 39 million carbon credits that don’t achieve real climate benefits. As they write, “They are, in effect, ghost credits that didn’t preserve additional carbon in forests but did allow polluters to emit far more CO2, equal to the annual emissions of 8.5 million cars at the high end.”

Reading it felt similar to chatting with Lisa in the kitchen: dense concepts clearly explained, complicated data carefully analyzed, plenty of nuance (the California Air Resources Board, which is responsible for the policy, defended the program and disputed that the estimates for carbon savings were inflated) that didn’t detract from the force of the findings.

In part because I miss those conversations, I asked Steve if I could hijack this space and assemble some of ProPublica’s climate reporters to talk informally about their work. He agreed, as did four brilliant reporters I’m lucky to work with. Our edited conversation is below; by way of an introduction, I asked each of them what story they’d send a new acquaintance if they were trying to explain their work.

Tony Briscoe, Reporter, Midwest

  • Millions of Homeowners Who Need Flood Insurance Don’t Know It — Thanks to FEMA

Lisa Song, Reporter

  • An (Even More) Inconvenient Truth: Why Carbon Credits For Forest Preservation May Be Worse Than Nothing

Elizabeth Weil, Reporter

  • They Know How to Prevent Megafires. Why Won’t Anybody Listen?

Lylla Younnes, News Applications Developer, Local Reporting Network

  • Welcome to “Cancer Alley,” Where Toxic Air Is About to Get Worse

What’s one thing you wish readers understood better about environmental coverage?

Lisa Song: I think it would be that the various people and organizations who advocate for environmental causes are not a monolith. There are many people who are doing various things to change or help the environment who wouldn’t even consider themselves environmentalists. Even if you just look at the biggest national environmental groups, everyone from the Environmental Defense Fund to the Sierra Club to 350.org, their names are recognizable nationwide by folks who cover this issue, but they sometimes have polar opposite reactions to certain policies and things that they support or don’t support. I wish more people recognized that sometimes groups that all vaguely want the same thing can have totally different solutions and policies and proposals.

One simple example is fracking. There were some environmental groups that were more okay with fracking, and others that were adamantly against it, no matter what rules were put in place.

Tony Briscoe: Science is complex. It’s messy. It’s not always that we’re dealing in certainties. I try to rely as much on observation as anything. It’s like, you could say that Illinois has warmed 1.2 degrees in the past century, or you can say that there are armadillos in southern Illinois and how strange is that? Sometimes it’s more about, well, this is the first time that we’ve observed this in a century and looking at ice bridges that used to support car traffic to islands in Wisconsin versus how ferries are running all year round. There are things that are just abnormal, that communities aren’t used to dealing with that, I think, resonate a little bit more than data does.

Lylla Younnes: It can be really difficult to find a direct cause and effect between a source and an individual harmed, but that doesn’t mean that we should look away. Sometimes the harm takes a very, very long time to reveal itself to us. And it obviously depends on the environmental issue. For forest fires, the harm’s there, it’s very present, we see it from outer space. But in the case of air toxics, for example, it’s sort of a lifetime of slow degrading on the body.

Elizabeth Weil: In a way, every story is a climate story. It’s important to know the particulars, but to extend climate as a framework for looking at the world is maybe the most important thing any of us can do as citizens.

That makes me think about how in recent years, I have noticed, environmental justice has become a more mainstream coverage area, as opposed to just environmental science. How has your understanding of that changed in your years doing this work?

LS: I would say that the environmental justice movement has always been there. Until fairly recently, it just hasn’t gotten the amount of mainstream, concerted effort in terms of coverage either by reporters or by politicians or policymakers. You’re starting to see a huge increase in folks representing EJ issues having a seat at the table. I think it’ll be interesting to see whether that’s a pattern and a trend that lasts.

TB: More people are challenging this thinking that certain things are accepted as normal. When we talk about environmental justice, places don’t necessarily have to be breaking the law to create harm. And I think that a lot of [environmental justice] uncovers a lot of different harms that exist within the parameters of what’s totally legal, which brings up a different kind of issue.

LY: I would echo that. I mean, one of the things that's really shocked me as I’ve just gained some more experience on this beat, which I mean, I really haven't been reporting on this for a super long time, but certain things are just completely legal. When I started, my baseline was probably “Oh, are they violating the legal limit?” And now I’m very much “Well, what is the legal limit? And how protective is the legal limit here? And how has it changed over time? Who were the people who’ve been responsible for its change?”

All of you have done stories that paint a very bleak picture of where we are versus where we ought to be in terms of our response to climate change. In your work, how do you balance hope and despair? Do you have any advice for how readers should apply those lenses to what they’re learning about the climate?

EW: Last summer, when California was on fire and the air was impossible to breathe, and I was new on the beat and reading intensely, it was really difficult. I had moments of feeling like “How does anybody do this?” The world itself returning to being a beautiful place physically, for me at least, was really important. To be able to go to the mountains and see that Earth is still actually really lovely and magical and beautiful and it’s not all gloom and doom was super important for me.

LY: There are victories sometimes, and it’s worth celebrating them. In St. James Parish, Louisiana, a plant that we reported on down there was going to become the largest petrochemical plant in America. It’s currently stalled, in a really rare case in which the Army Corps of Engineers basically pulled at the last minute their permits for additional inspection. It was a really incredible moment, because that would have never happened had the community not banded together and for years persistently organized against this plant. I think one of the heartening things is community engagement, and documenting it. In some cases they are successful.

LS: On climate change in particular, there’s a really useful framing from NASA climate scientist Kate Marvel, who said, “Climate change isn’t a cliff we fall off, but a slope we slide down.”

It’s not a binary: Are we saved or are we doomed? Rather, it’s about how far down the hill are we going to fall? So, to think about it that way, every 10th of a degree that you can further prevent warming is a good thing and will have massively good consequences for the world. There’s a big difference between letting climate change raise average temperatures by three degrees versus two degrees. With every new policy and every incremental step, that’s always a good thing.

TB: With climate change, I think it really helps [to focus on] what makes these communities special, what they’ve had for generation after generation, and what we can hold on to. Highlighting that, for me, has been huge.

Lake Erie is the walleye capital of the world, where it’s only got 2% of the water volume of the Great Lakes, but it has 50% of the fish. So, [knowing that] really helps home in on why the annual dead zone is a big deal for the fishermen that are there. It’s one thing to say that you’ve never been ice fishing. It’s another thing to say that you’ll never go ice fishing.

Are there personal behaviors that you have changed since you started doing your reporting?

LS: There’s a lot of greenwashed product stuff, where different companies are like, “Buy our eco-conscious product here.” Being able to see through the greenwashing is interesting both for myself and sometimes talking about it with friends, and, you know, sort of confirming that buying a giant box of stuff to replace other stuff you might have used is not necessarily always the best choice if you care about the environment.

LY: I don’t feel like I’ve changed my behavior nearly enough. I think I’m just a lot more painfully aware of different things. I mean, I don’t buy plastic if I can help it, because I know how awful it is to produce it, how much it affects communities around plastics plants.

TB: Being frank about the evidence that exists that debunks climate skepticism. I feel not only more capable, but also compelled to debunk that information, given how much climate skepticism there has been.

EW: A new framework for viewing the world is really the most major change. But because this is now my work, I have lots of conversations with people about the climate crisis, which is a change, and a really positive one.

What Else We Published This Week
He Bought Health Insurance for Emergencies. Then He Fell Into a $33,601 Trap.
Since the Trump administration deregulated the health insurance industry, there’s been an explosion of short-term plans that leave patients with surprise bills and providers with huge revenue.
by Jenny Deam
The U.S. Owes Hawaiians Millions of Dollars Worth of Land. Congress Helped Make Sure the Debt Wasn’t Paid.
In a 1995 law, the U.S. promised to pay its land debt to Hawaiians, thousands of whom are waiting for homes. But Congress, including the state’s own delegation, voted to give the land to other parties.
by Rob Perez, Honolulu Star-Advertiser
How the Deals Approved by Congress Bypassed Thousands of Hawaiians Waiting for Homes
A 1995 law sought to repay land debt to Native Hawaiians. But when excess plots became available, much of the desirable land went elsewhere through private sales. Here's how the deals were authorized.
by Rob Perez, Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Trump Spawned a New Group of Mega-Donors Who Now Hold Sway Over the GOP’s Future
These powerful donors, who each contributed more than $1 million, shied away from party politics before Trump. What brought them off the sidelines?
by Isaac Arnsdorf
A Crisis of Undiagnosed Cancers Is Emerging in the Pandemic’s Second Year
A factory worker didn’t want to call in sick or catch COVID-19, so she tried to ignore the pain. Now she has stage 4 cancer.
by Duaa Eldeib, video by Alex Garcia, special to ProPublica
Close this screen
Close this screen

Republish This Story for Free

Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Thank you for your interest in republishing this story. You are are free to republish it so long as you do the following:

  • You have to credit ProPublica and any co-reporting partners. In the byline, we prefer “Author Name, Publication(s).” At the top of the text of your story, include a line that reads: “This story was originally published by ProPublica.” You must link the word “ProPublica” to the original URL of the story.
  • If you’re republishing online, you must link to the URL of this story on propublica.org, include all of the links from our story, including our newsletter sign up language and link, and use our PixelPing tag.
  • If you use canonical metadata, please use the ProPublica URL. For more information about canonical metadata, refer to this Google SEO link.
  • You can’t edit our material, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”)
  • You cannot republish our photographs or illustrations without specific permission. Please contact [email protected].
  • It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads, but not ads specifically sold against our stories. You can’t state or imply that donations to your organization support ProPublica’s work.
  • You can’t sell our material separately or syndicate it. This includes publishing or syndicating our work on platforms or apps such as Apple News, Google News, etc.
  • You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. (To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, contact [email protected].)
  • You can’t use our work to populate a website designed to improve rankings on search engines or solely to gain revenue from network-based advertisements.
  • We do not generally permit translation of our stories into another language.
  • Any website our stories appear on must include a prominent and effective way to contact you.

Copy and paste the following into your page to republish:

Close this menu
  • Graphics & Data
  • Topics
  • Series
  • Videos
  • Impact
  • ProPublica
  • Local Initiatives
  • Data Store

Follow Us:

  • Like us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter

Stay informed with the Daily Digest.

Site Navigation

Sections

  • ProPublica
  • Local Reporting Network
  • Texas Tribune Partnership
  • The Data Store
  • Electionland

Browse by Type

  • Topics
  • Series
  • Videos
  • News Apps
  • Get Involved
  • The Nerd Blog
  • @ProPublica
  • Events

Info

  • About Us
  • Board and Advisors
  • Officers and Staff
  • Diversity
  • Jobs and Fellowships
  • Local Initiatives
  • Media Center
  • Reports
  • Impact
  • Awards
  • Corrections

Policies

  • Code of Ethics
  • Advertising Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Follow

  • Newsletters
  • Podcast
  • iOS and Android
  • RSS Feed

More

  • Send Us Tips
  • Steal Our Stories
  • Browse via Tor
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • More Ways to Give
ProPublica

Journalism in the Public Interest

© Copyright 2025 Pro Publica Inc.
Current site Current page