Does Stevens’ Conviction Disqualify Him from the Senate?
Today, a jury convicted Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK) today on felony charges that he made false financial statements about gifts he received in exchange for political patronage.
Do Senate rules require Stevens to step down?
No, but precedent suggests he is unlikely to keep his office.
There is no rule saying that a convicted felon must be expelled from the Senate, says Howard Gantman, staff director for the Senate Rules and Administration Committee. But the Senate Ethics Committee can choose to recommend that the senator is expelled. A two-thirds vote is then needed from the entire Senate to expel him.
The Ethics Committee could also decide to wait for the outcome of Stevens’ appeal. But the last time a senator was convicted of a felony—almost 30 years ago—the committee didn’t wait.
Harrison Williams, a Democratic Senator from New Jersey, was convicted in May 1981 of charges related to the FBI’s investigation of a bribery scandal known as ABSCAM. In August of the same year, the Ethics Committee recommended his expulsion. Williams stayed in office through the beginning of 1982, until the Senate began to debate the issue. He found few defenders on the Senate floor, and resigned before his colleagues had a chance to act. Williams was later sentenced to three years in prison.
Stevens is only the fifth senator convicted of a felony in the history of the Senate. None of the other were expelled. Truman Newberry was convicted in 1920 of election fraud, but his conviction was overturned. Joseph Burton of Kansas resigned after a bribery conviction in 1906, and John Hipple Mitchell, busted for bribery in 1905, died before the Senate could expel him. Only 15 senators have been expelled in the history of the Senate—14 for supporting the Confederacy during the Civil War.
In any case, the Alaskan Senator is up for re-election in just eight days, meaning voters will likely get a chance to expel him before the Senate does.
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- Allergan Erases Doctor Payment Records
- With Spotlight on Super PAC Dollars, Nonprofits Escape Scrutiny
- Senators Slam Freddie on Bets Against Homeowners
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- Meet the Obscure Federal Regulator Who's Not Helping Homeowners
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- Why Millions Won't Get Help From Big Mortgage Settlement
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- One Soldier's Progress Against Traumatic Brain Injury
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told







2 comments
BradC
Oct. 28, 2008, 12:08 p.m.
“Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AL)”
AL is Alabama, AK is Alaska
Eric Umansky
ProPublica
Oct. 28, 2008, 1:17 p.m.
Thanks, Brad. We’re fixing it.
Commenting on this story is closed.