Jane Mayer’s The Dark Side: Chapter 1
Yesterday we spoke with The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer about “The Dark Side,” her new book exploring the White House’s move to abusive interrogations after 9/11. Today, we have a bonus: The first chapter of the book. Enjoy.
Safeguard the public interest.
Support ProPublica’s award-winning investigative journalism.
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- Feds Warn Residents Near Wyoming Gas Drilling Sites Not to Drink Their Water
- Documents Tie German Company to Chinese Subsidiary That Produced Defective Drywall
- Loan Mod Profiles: Fed Up, Giving Up
- New Gulf Compensation Chief Lags in Processing Claims
- Loan Mod Profiles: In Trial Limbo
- Rep. Teague Pledges Deeper Inquiry Into Treatment for Brain-Injured Soldiers
- Profiled Homeowner Gets a Mortgage Modification
- What You Need to Know About Hydrofracking
- Rare Interrogator Testimony Defeats Gitmo Torture Claim in Civilian Court
- As Gulf Spill Claims Czar Takes Over, a Checklist of Promised Changes
- Banks' Self-Dealing Super-Charged Financial Crisis
- Loan Mod Profiles: In Trial Limbo
- For Mosques, 'Anywhere But There' Echoes Far Beyond Ground Zero
- New Gulf Compensation Chief Lags in Processing Claims
- Loan Mod Profiles: Fed Up, Giving Up
- Feds Warn Residents Near Wyoming Gas Drilling Sites Not to Drink Their Water
- As Gulf Spill Claims Czar Takes Over, a Checklist of Promised Changes
- Profiled Homeowner Gets a Mortgage Modification
- For Gov't Mortgage Mod Program, New Numbers Show Old Problems
- Take It With a Grain of (Sea) Salt: Gulf Microbe Study Was Funded by BP





1 comments
William Thomsen
July 16, 2008, 4 p.m.
One can sympathize with the terrible choices the administration was faced with after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
I, however, believe that the administration went to far in their, arguably, knee-jerk reaction (perhaps it was a well planned reaction?). I also get the impression that much of the stone-walling now is, in great part, due to the fear that the administration has that it will be prosecuted for some of the positions and policies they have taken and made.
The chapter also indicates that members of the administration had clear policy objectives which may have been well served by the terror attack. In the case of Cheney it appears that he always wanted to dramatically expand the power of the Executive just as it is becoming apparent that the decision to declare war on Iraq was a preferred policy of many in the administration prior to the terror attacks.
It is hard to know, definitavely, whether the administration used the terror attacks to press for the policies they wanted or whether the policies they wanted happened to be the prescription for the security issues the United States faces and has always faced. I am getting the impression that it is the former.
The United States has a history of terrorism (school and work shootings, abortion bombings, Waco, Oklahoma, lynchings) and it is interesting that none of the dramatic measures instituted by the Bush administration were needed, or in place, prior to September 11, 2001.
We managed just fine using our Constitution for over two hundred years and I am wondering why it is, all of a sudden, a burden to follow the law.