Judiciary Committee Votes to Start Impeachment Investigation of Federal Judge
The House Judiciary Committee voted unanimously today for a task force to investigate whether to impeach Judge Thomas Porteous, who served in federal district court in New Orleans since 1994.
As our post Tuesday reported, Porteous is at the center of judicial and U.S. Department of Justice investigations alleging that he took cash, hunting trips and steak dinners from five attorneys and two companies that had 25 cases before him.
If the task force investigation moves into next year, Porteous would be the first federal judge to face impeachment in 20 years.
Investigators from a special committee of the U.S. 5th Circuit Judicial Council said they counted $80,000 in unexplained deposits into Porteous’ bank and money market accounts.
The documents also describe Porteous’ bankruptcy case, which he initially filed under a false name and pursued even as he continued to rack up gambling debts. Porteous weighed in (PDF) on the allegations in December 2007, citing Hurricane Katrina, the loss of his wife and alcohol and gambling addictions as complicating factors in his life.
Jonathan Godfrey, spokesman for the Judiciary Committee, said the task force will be formed in coming days and will begin investigating, hold hearings and possibly subpoena witnesses.
Godfrey said the task force technically will expire Jan. 2, 2009, when the next session of Congress begins, but members will likely be re-appointed and move forward.
Eventually, the task force will send its recommendations to the full judiciary panel for a vote on whether to impeach. If so, Porteous would face a trial in the Senate to determine if he can remain in office.
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- Allergan Erases Doctor Payment Records
- With Spotlight on Super PAC Dollars, Nonprofits Escape Scrutiny
- Senators Slam Freddie on Bets Against Homeowners
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- Meet the Obscure Federal Regulator Who's Not Helping Homeowners
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- Why Millions Won't Get Help From Big Mortgage Settlement
- One Soldier's Progress Against Traumatic Brain Injury
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told







3 comments
Warner Todd Huston
Sept. 19, 2008, 5:16 a.m.
I thought you guys were going to be “non-partisan” at proPublica? Was it so “partisan” to mention this judge was a Clinton appointee… or are you trying to HIDE that fact?
Richard Tofel
Sept. 21, 2008, 10:37 a.m.
The article clearly states that Judge Porteous was appointed in 1994. We think ProPublica readers know who was president that year.
Warner Todd Huston
Sept. 21, 2008, 7:24 p.m.
I see. Well, then, if you are going to expect your readers to do their own research on every story, why bother to write anything at all? Why not just put out opinions instead of “news”? I mean, you can use that excuse you just gave to exclude ANY point of fact, after all.
Commenting on this story is closed.