Obama’s and McCain’s Positions on Executive Power
An article this week by Politico’s John Bresnahan examined Barack Obama’s and John McCain’s stances on presidential power and how they would regard restraints on their own authority.
The Bush administration will leave behind a far more muscular executive branch considering its use of signing statements, claims of executive privilege, and the decision-making authority vested in the vice president. Charlie Savage, a 2007 Pulitzer recipient for his work uncovering Bush’s views on executive power for The Boston Globe (he now writes for The New York Times), has made the case that these trends reflect a political philosophy, in gestation since the Nixon years, that argues for unfettered executive power and minimal congressional and judicial oversight in the face of grave foreign threats.
Savage also argues that Bush’s successor will be hard pressed to scale back his executive power. Others—including legal scholar Jack Balkin and the libertarian writer Gene Healey—agree that these trends aren’t the exclusive domain of the Republican party.
Apart from the Politico piece and a survey of candidates last December by Savage, Obama and McCain have rarely been pressed on the issue. So we thought it would be helpful to present the statements the two have made on executive power.
Read what Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama have said about executive power.
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- The 182 Percent Loan: How Installment Lenders Put Borrowers in a World of Hurt
- IRS Office That Targeted Tea Party Also Disclosed Confidential Docs From Conservative Groups
- Medicare Drug Program Fails to Monitor Prescribers, Putting Seniors and Disabled at Risk
- On Victory Drive, Soldiers Defeated by Debt
- The Most Important #Muckreads on Rape in the Military
- Everything We Know About What’s Happened Under Sequestration
- The Story Behind Our Hospital Interactive
- Is Obama Delivering on His Promise of a “21st Century” Approach to Drugs?
- Lifting the Veil on Dangerous Prescribing
- FAQ: What You Need to Know About Prescriber Checkup
- IRS Office That Targeted Tea Party Also Disclosed Confidential Docs From Conservative Groups
- The 182 Percent Loan: How Installment Lenders Put Borrowers in a World of Hurt
- Everything We Know About What’s Happened Under Sequestration
- On Victory Drive, Soldiers Defeated by Debt
- How the IRS’s Nonprofit Division Got So Dysfunctional
- Medicare Drug Program Fails to Monitor Prescribers, Putting Seniors and Disabled at Risk
- Is Obama Delivering on His Promise of a “21st Century” Approach to Drugs?
- Intern vs. Mayor: Battle Bares Bloomberg's Argument for Secrecy
- The Most Important #Muckreads on Rape in the Military
- The Story Behind Our Hospital Interactive







1 comments
William Thomsen
July 15, 2008, 8:23 p.m.
It would be so much easier if the Congress just limited the Executive branch more effectively.
I do wonder a couple of things:
Which of these new or expanded powers is backed by a federal court ruling? I am not saying that there are none. If anyone knows any please post a link so I can read them. I don’t know enough about the basis of the expanded powers.
How many of these powers are currently being discussed by the democratic Congress? Perhaps the democratic Congress can limit some of these powers.
I think the Congress has to limit the Executive branch more effectively. If they did that I wouldn’t have to worry about Obama or McCain.
Commenting on this story is closed.