ProPublica

Journalism in the Public Interest

Cancel

Did the Dark Money Group that Spurred a Landmark Ruling Mislead the IRS?

A nonprofit group that filed a lawsuit that led the Supreme Court to apply its Citizens United decision to states told the IRS that it wouldn’t intervene in elections – after it already had.

.

A nonprofit group that filed a lawsuit that led the Supreme Court to apply its Citizens United decision to states told the IRS that it wouldn't intervene in elections – after it already had. (Evan Vucci/AP Photo)

Jan. 16 Update: Two campaign-finance watchdog groups urged the IRS on Wednesday to investigate whether Western Tradition Partnership submitted false information to obtain its social welfare status in 2008. Democracy 21 and the Campaign Legal Center cited reporting done by ProPublica and PBS “Frontline” that showed the group claimed it would not participate in elections in its IRS application, even though it had already spent money on elections

The two watchdog groups also cited reporting that showed Western Tradition Partnership, now known as American Tradition Partnership, asked the IRS to expedite its request for tax-exempt status because otherwise, its major donor would pull funding. That alleged donor, Jake Jabs, told ProPublica and Frontline that he never pledged money to the group, and bank records that were later released revealed no donations from Jabs.

Here is a copy of the watchdogs' letter to the IRS.

A western nonprofit that played a key role in freeing corporate spending on elections nationwide appears to have misled the IRS when it applied for the tax-exempt status that shields its donors from being publicly disclosed.

Documents obtained by ProPublica and Frontline show that Western Tradition Partnership, now known as American Tradition Partnership, said it would not attempt to sway elections when it asked the IRS to recognize it as a tax-exempt social welfare organization in late 2008.

Shortly before submitting the application, however, Western Tradition Partnership, which bills itself as a "grassroots lobbying" organization dedicated to fighting radical environmentalists, and a related political committee sent out fliers weighing in on candidates for Montana state office. The mailers blitzed districts in Montana days before the Republican primary.

Donny Ferguson, listed as the national director of media of American Tradition Partnership on the group's website, did not return a call or an email for comment.

Social welfare nonprofits — also called dark money groups because they are not required to identify their donors — have poured tens of millions of dollars into state and federal elections in recent years.

As spelled out in the tax code, the primary purpose of such groups is not supposed to be political. Yet a ProPublica story published in August showed that dozens of social welfare nonprofits, some formed in the run-up to the 2010 election, had underreported the extent of their political spending and activities to the IRS.

Western Tradition Partnership, though little-known outside Montana and Colorado, is not just any social welfare nonprofit.

Its lawsuit challenging Montana's ban on corporations buying independent political ads led to a ruling this June by the U.S. Supreme Court that effectively extended the court's 2010 Citizens United decision to all states.

For the last two years, Western Tradition Partnership has been locked in a dispute with Montana authorities over whether it should be subject to the state's rules for political committees.

After its mailings before the 2008 primary, the group and its political committee, the Coalition for Energy and the Environment, which uses the same federal employer identification number, sent out more fliers criticizing or praising candidates in the general election.

The group engaged in similar activities before state elections in 2010 in both Montana and Colorado. One of its fliers featured the face of Colorado state Sen. Gail Schwartz, a Democrat, grafted onto Donald Trump's body, with the tagline, "You're Fired!"

In October 2010, Montana's Commissioner on Political Practices issued a report finding that the group's purpose was "to directly influence candidate elections through surreptitious means." The commissioner determined that the group should have registered as a political committee and reported its donors and should be fined.

Western Tradition Partnership has sued the state over the ruling. The case is set for a hearing in March.

When it applied for IRS recognition in the latter half of 2008, Western Tradition Partnership explicitly said it would not be involved in elections.

"The organization will not directly or indirectly participate or intervene on behalf of or in opposition to a candidate for public office," the group wrote in its application, submitted under penalty of perjury.

Western Tradition Partnership also asked the IRS for expedited recognition, saying that without it, the group's principal donor, Jacob Jabs, would pull a planned grant of $300,000.

Identifying Jabs was a highly unusual step: Social welfare nonprofits almost never disclose their donors.

Jabs appears to be the head of American Furniture Warehouse in Colorado, the state's largest furniture retailer. He did not return calls made to his office.

Athena Dalton, who signed the request letter, and Scott Shires, a Republican operative from Colorado who signed Western Tradition Partnership's IRS application, also did not return calls for comment.

The IRS recognized the group on Oct. 2, 2008, three days after its request.

Despite the media attention prompted by the Supreme Court's ruling this summer, Western Tradition Partnership does not appear to have drawn scrutiny from the IRS for the statements in its application.

Though the group remains active, the IRS could locate no tax returns for it after 2008. Nonprofits that do not file tax returns for three consecutive years can lose their tax-exempt status.

* * *

On Oct. 30, in a special investigation in collaboration with Marketplace, FRONTLINE travels to the remote epicenter of the campaign finance debate for a tale of money, politics, and intrigue. How has the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision changed campaigns in America? Ask Montana, which has tried to challenge the ruling in court, is investigating alleged campaign abuses, and is playing host to a bitter race that could decide control of the U.S. Senate. FRONTLINE correspondent and Marketplace host Kai Ryssdal reports.

United America Party

Oct. 22, 2012, 10:23 a.m.

Sounds like a Political organization to us.

Failing to post in ProPublica I succeeded posting in Forbes. This is 8th attempt!

........
Shah Islam 2 minutes ago


I’m, for the first time facing severe difficulties in posting the following in my favorite Journalism: ProPublica. Would you: Forbes please offer me some help?
………….
At this rapidly advancing digital age, the birth of a Brand-new North-American Political party {e.g. SHGP (Shahislam’s Humanitarian Global Party) as is well intended to be explained soon in http://www.shahislam.com} looks like is necessary in order to give USA a new identity in global-leadership (without secret & evil influence of hereditarily super-wealthy groups of old thugs -still in hidden manipulative control of Western Supreme Courts) and positively change the world to be ‘politically war-crime-free’ a safer and better place for all the races (nations, countries or mankind, whatever may be named) on earth.

Poor guvment

Gosh, why would anybody think that a group dedicated to essentially laundering money for political purposes be anything but above-board in its dealings…?

Keeping in mind that this is a campaign where both major parties have blown off accusations of accepting foreign money (Romney at his English and Israeli fundraisers, Obama over his website’s payment processing) without any investigation, the real question isn’t whether the organization lied, but whether the IRS bought the lie or cooperated with it.