GOP Senate Leader Hedges on Expulsion for Stevens
We’ve been wondering about Senator Ted Stevens’ future on Capitol Hill now that he’s both a convicted felon and apparently on his way to re-election.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell seemed to take a harsh stance on Stevens’ political future. “I think he should resign immediately,” McConnell told the Lexington Herald-Leader. “If he did not do that ... there is a 100 percent certainty that he would be expelled from the Senate.”
We flagged another one of McConnell’s comments on Stevens earlier today—and didn’t notice that McConnell had a bit of a hedge in it. “If he is re-elected and the felony charge stands through the appeals process,” McConnnell said, “there is zero chance that a senator with a felony conviction would not be expelled from the Senate.”
That suggests that McConnell would only push for expulsion once Stevens’ appeals are over, a process that could take years.
We spoke with Don Stewart, McConnell’s communications director, to see if that’s what McConnell meant. Stewart reiterated McConnell’s position that Stevens should resign. But, he added, McConnell would wait to see if the corruption convictions (seven counts, remember) survive appeal before recommending the boot.
As we’ve noted before, a two-thirds vote is required by the Senate to expel one of their own. Despite yesterday’s gains, the Democrats are still short of that. That means if Stevens is going to be expelled, at least some Republicans will have to support the move.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said earlier that Democrats would push to expel Stevens immediately if he’s re-elected. We’ve called Reid’s office to get their opinion on McConnell’s stance but haven’t heard back yet.
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- Allergan Erases Doctor Payment Records
- With Spotlight on Super PAC Dollars, Nonprofits Escape Scrutiny
- Senators Slam Freddie on Bets Against Homeowners
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- Meet the Obscure Federal Regulator Who's Not Helping Homeowners
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- Why Millions Won't Get Help From Big Mortgage Settlement
- One Soldier's Progress Against Traumatic Brain Injury
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told







2 comments
Alex Bowles
Nov. 5, 2008, 11:08 p.m.
The GOP has just been handed its biggest defeat in a generation, and they respond by prevaricating over Stevens?
If this is any indication as to how shameless and out of touch they’ve become, they may be stuck in the wilderness for a while.
Jacqueline Young
Nov. 18, 2008, 11:55 a.m.
I am no fan of Ted Stevens, but I do feel that this case is an opportunity to re-examine the basis of “felony” laws. Many years ago I served for a month on a grand jury and I was struck, even then, by how the dollar amount of a “felony” seemed to be awfully low for such harsh punishment.
Has the “felony” failed to keep up with inflation? It is supposed to indicate a serious crime versus a smaller crime. When I looked at the crimes Senator Stevens committed, I felt that here was a case of the rich and powerful getting the same mis-justice that has put so many people in jail and deprived them of their vote and all hope, for crimes that were really not all that serious.
Commenting on this story is closed.