Transparency Groups: Obama Makes Strides but Still Has Work to Do
In November, we wrote about the transparency to-do list (PDF) that open-records advocates gave President Obama.
So three months after the inauguration, how has the administration done so far?
While the Obama administration is clearly more transparent than the previous administration, it still has a ways to go to accomplish what transparency groups recommended for its first 100 days, according to an assessment released today by OMB Watch.
On the plus side, President Obama hit the ground running on transparency issues:
- Cite transparency in inaugural address. Check. ("As Justice Louis Brandeis once said, sunlight is the greatest disinfectant.")
- Revoke President Bush's executive order that limited access to presidential records. Check. (Inside his first 100 days, Obama also authorized the release of over 250,000 pages of previously sealed presidential records.)
- Reverse John Ashcroft's FOIA memorandum (PDF) that told agencies they had the administration's backing to withhold information. Check. Obama's new policy can be summed as, "When in doubt, let it out."
The administration has made strides on other transparency issues, the assessment found, but its record so far is not spotless.
For example, the assessment knocked the administration for "maintaining the Bush administration's broad interpretation of executive branch power on the issue of state secrets." (Here's our comparison of the stances of Obama and former President Bush on national security cases.)
And consider the task of making government expenditures and contracting information more widely available. Recovery.gov was up and running in February, but many details about how stimulus money will be spent are still not there, or are in a format you'd have to be a rocket scientist to decipher.
The administration also has promised a Web site -- data.gov -- that would be a clearinghouse for government data. So far the site contains two words: "Coming soon."
Get Updates
Our Hottest Stories
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- Allergan Erases Doctor Payment Records
- With Spotlight on Super PAC Dollars, Nonprofits Escape Scrutiny
- Senators Slam Freddie on Bets Against Homeowners
- Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners
- Drive-by Scanning: Officials Expand Use and Dose of Radiation for Security Screening
- How the Stimulus Revived the Electric Car
- Meet the Obscure Federal Regulator Who's Not Helping Homeowners
- By the Numbers: Life and Death at Foxconn
- Why Millions Won't Get Help From Big Mortgage Settlement
- Why Fannie and Freddie Are Hesitating to Help Homeowners
- $10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of Blood Services
- One Soldier's Progress Against Traumatic Brain Injury
- Bets Against Homeowners Must Stop, Freddie Mac Was Told






