ProPublica

Journalism in the Public Interest

Cancel

Supervisors and Sexual Harassment: The Law’s Murkier Than You Think

.

Getty Images file photos

The news about both Dominique Strauss-Kahn and Arnold Schwarzenegger has brought renewed attention to what seems like a myriad of past allegations of sexual harassment by the two politicians. Strauss-Kahn and Schwarzenegger have also both now acknowledged relationships with women who worked for them.

So, when something happens between a boss and employee, where’s the line between harassment and a consensual relationship? It turns out the law isn’t as clear as you might think.

In the United States, certain situations are considered inherently coercive. For instance, sexual contact between prison guards and inmates—even if it’s entirely consensual—is sexual abuse by definition. However, laws governing the workplace are far more permissive, though companies may adopt their own, more stringent policies. 

Under U.S. federal anti-discrimination law, sexual advances or comments in the workplace aren’t necessarily against the law, and that’s even if there’s a big power gap at play, Ernest Haffner, a senior attorney at the government’s Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, told me.

“If that were true, a romantic relationship could never be consensual or welcome in a particular workplace,” Haffner said. “I don’t think case law supports that.”

Instead, the test is whether the sexual comments or conduct was unwelcome. Sound simple? Not so fast.

Experts say there aren’t hard-and-fast rules for judging whether conduct is unwelcome. “Unwelcomeness is tricky,” said Haffner. “The person may subjectively believe that the conduct is unwelcome, but you have to objectively be able to show it.”

In some cases, a person may be able to show that advances were unwelcome even though he or she didn’t protest or say so at the time. “Consensual” isn’t the same thing as ”welcome,” experts say. It all comes down to a close analysis of any given situation.

Lawyers told us that power dynamics can be a factor. Past history between the two people can also be a factor. Even body language can be a factor.

“The bright line is it being unwelcome, but the facts that make that up are really going to depend on the circumstances,” said Fatima Graves of the National Women’s Law Center, noting that courts have ruled differently. “Some courts have said that it’s important for the employee to communicate clearly that it is unwelcome,” Graves noted.

That’s why the government and anti-discrimination groups encourage people who believe they’re being harassed to inform the harasser directly that the advances, comments or conduct are unwelcome. Legal Momentum, a women’s rights group, warns the targets of harassment, “Your legal claims can be hurt if you keep silent.” It also provides a sample letter [PDF] to send to a harasser, suggests reporting the harassment to the company and recommends holding on to all records documenting the harassment itself and complaints about it.

Once it’s established that the conduct was sexual harassment, it’s up to the company to prove that it’s not liable. If the harasser was in a supervisory role, the company is almost always liable, though companies can try to argue that the person didn’t make use of internal channels to report the harassment or waited too long to do so.

Under U.S. anti-discrimination law—civil statutes—there are caps on how much companies can be forced to pay if the case goes to trial. They’re based on the size of the company—and awards for even the largest companies are capped at $300,000, though this doesn’t include compensation for, say, medical or therapy expenses incurred as a result of the harassment.

More often than not, however, these cases will settle out of court. President Bill Clinton famously paid Paula Jones $850,000 to make her sexual harassment lawsuit go away, with no apology or admission of guilt needed on Clinton’s part. Just last year, former Hewlett-Packard CEO Mark Hurd settled for an undisclosed amount a sexual harassment claim brought by a company contractor.

Not all workers in the United States are covered by federal sexual harassment laws, however. The housekeeper with whom Schwarzenegger fathered a child out of wedlock, for instance, most likely was not.

“You have to have so many employees before you’re covered,” said Michelle Caiola, a senior attorney at Legal Momentum who previously worked for the government’s EEOC. “Being an employer of one person in a household—that wouldn’t be covered.”

The problem with making it clear, by letter or otherwise, to the harrassing superior, that the comments are unwelcome, is that in this economy many victims would probably kiss a supervisor’s a** to keep from losing his/her job.  Especially when it’s a good, prestigious and lucrative one.  Remember the old term “brown-nosing”?

Richard McDonough

May 19, 2011, 7:42 p.m.

Historically, Time Inc handled this well.  I believe.  Empasis, please.

Many couples worked in the same environment.  Many people who worked together in a relatively egalitarian environment at the time (times, perhaps, 50’s-80’s, for the sake of the argument) fell in love, worked together, lived together, as consenting adults operating at high levels of professionalism.  This, de facto, precluded servant-master relationships.  The Schwarzeneger situation is very different.  It is clearly master-servant.  It is exploitative.  It is more than subtly different.  And its furtive nature is significantly telling.

The civilized world, one which a primitive like our ego-needy ex governor is unfamiliar with, handles love, different from lustful rooting, in a different way.  It weighs the differences.  It disdains the behavior of ego-needy primitives while understanding the phyical manifestation of love. 

The once governor is a shameful example of the underdeveloped male, steroids aside.  He is a human disgrace.  He is an organism of a primitive kind.  He is a serial fool without the ability to separate impulse felt and adult responsible action. This is not even to speak of the affect on normally developed people…wife, children…with whom he is unfortunately connected.  He is not to be pitied but disdained as an error inmale evolution.

In a country, such as Italy, where “honor killings” were decriminalized not too long ago, you might wonder why workplace sexual harassment is no big deal: supposedly.
Ever since Berlusconi took power he and his fawners were setting out to change italian mentality through his media force de frappe; for almost 20 years the whole country has been under Berlusconi government’s curse of institutionalizing crime as a presence no longer mediated by political go-betweens as a sine qua non to function.
You can imagine what that means in human relations terms, especially the master-slave attitude advocated by a behavioral disposition essential to get any job that allowed you to get on in life: If you were a young and pretty woman expect to stick to this - and that changed the way even of how adolescent girls were looking at themselves and what to do with their bodies. Basically a marketable asset, where intelligence was considered a hindrance, after hours upon hours of Berlusconi’s TV watching.
People in power mostly exploited that arrogance adducing to the following: either you are an accomplice or you’re out. And that’s that.
Now the fact that young - even underage -  prostitutes were (and still are) lionized at the premier’s huge parties (let’s call it that way for elegance’s sake, but read orgies) speaks volumes of how backward the country has fallen. It will be upon the newly “wind of change” already experienced in Milan with the recent municipal elections to get rid of all that distorted weltanschauung once for all.

Elizabeth Spahn

May 20, 2011, 7:51 a.m.

Rape, sexual and physical abuse of domestic workers is a very serious problem worldwide, including in the United States.  These workers are often isolated in the home; often lack access to basic information about how to protect themselves due to language and cultural barriers.  Many are very young women, barely out of childhood.  Add draconian attitudes about immigrants, non-whites, and ESL or accent discrimination to the power relationship between the master and servant, and you have a perfect storm. 
The days of the slave master’s right to rape “their” women (droit du seigneur) should be over.  This principle should apply especially to the most powerful and famous men.

This is a good summary of federal law, but there are many state and local laws that provide additional protections - e.g., unlimited damages, the right to a jury trial, and coverage for smaller employers. New York state and New York City both have their own sexual harassment laws.

Add a comment

Email me when someone responds to this article.

Get Updates

Stay on top of what we’re working on by subscribing to our email digest.

optional

Our Hottest Stories

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •