Gitmo and the Federal Judiciary: Our Coverage of the Habeas Lawsuits
The WikiLeaks documents released on Sunday night have raised again the legal and moral dilemma surrounding the indefinite detention of the Guantanamo prisoners, an issue that former ProPublica reporter Chisun Lee covered for more than two years.
The WikiLeaks documents released on Sunday night have raised again the legal and moral dilemma surrounding the indefinite detention of the Guantanamo prisoners, an issue that former ProPublica reporter Chisun Lee covered for more than two years. On Aug. 21, 2009 Lee wrote that the federal judges who were reviewing the habeas lawsuits filed by many Guantanamo inmates had found that more than half of the men whose cases they had completed at that point were unlawfully detained.
That story was accompanied by a chart containing documents and information about 53 Guantanamo detainees whose lawsuits seeking freedom had been decided by the judges. In a Jan. 22, 2010 article, three federal judges discussed their concerns about the Guantanamo cases in lengthy interviews with Lee.
The government remains uncertain what to do with its prisoners at Guantanamo Bay.
Latest Stories in this Project
Our Hottest Stories
- In Desegregation Case, Judge Blasts School Officials and Justice Department
- Meet the Online Tracking Device That is Virtually Impossible to Block
- California Halts Injection of Fracking Waste, Warning it May Be Contaminating Aquifers
- What We Learned Investigating Unpaid Internships
- Who Advised Cuomo on Mortgage Industry Investigation? A Mortgage Lobbyist
- Are Patient Privacy Laws Being Misused to Protect Medical Centers?
- Thank You for Your Service: How One Company Sues Soldiers Worldwide
- New York State of Fracking: A ProPublica Explainer
- Even After Open Enrollment, Activity Remains Unexpectedly High on Federal Health Insurance Exchange
- Error: You Have No Payments from Pharma